And now an unfiltered message from Attorney General Eric Holder:
"This ruling didn't turn out the way we wanted so we're going to ignore it. This changes nothing, b!tches. Don't like it? F-- You. Do something about it. Any state that thinks it can change anything without clearing it with us first is gonna wind up with my foot stuck in it's a**. Got me? I'm lookin' at you South Carolina."
1 posted on
06/25/2013 11:57:46 AM PDT by
servo1969
To: servo1969
2 posted on
06/25/2013 12:02:02 PM PDT by
MeganC
(A gun is like a parachute. If you need one, and don't have one, you'll never need one again.)
To: servo1969
He... said he was "deeply disappointed" in the decision, saying discriminatory practices live on and need to be addressed.
Yeah, keeping those illegal aliens and felons from voting 3 or 4 times is SOOOOO discriminatory.
3 posted on
06/25/2013 12:04:30 PM PDT by
fwdude
( You cannot compromise with that which you must defeat.)
To: servo1969
He said the Justice Department would not hesitate to take "swift" action against states looking to "take advantage" of the ruling. How does he intend to proceed? He can't use the VRA anymore and the Constitution clearly puts this issue in the hands of the States.
To: servo1969
"... the 'Justice' Department will not hesitate to take "swift" action against states looking to "take advantage" of this ruling."
To: servo1969
I was always appalled that my county, in Texas, STILL had to get DOJ approval just to change voting locations...
It was RIDICULOUS. We did not have significant race relation issues where I lived. There was ZERO need for this kind of over-sight... just because of problems that happened 40-50 years ago.
6 posted on
06/25/2013 12:11:30 PM PDT by
SomeCallMeTim
( The best minds are not in government. If any were, business would hire them f)
To: servo1969
He said the Justice Department would not hesitate to take "swift" action against states looking to "take advantage" of the ruling.
IOW, don't think that the Supreme Court ruling is actually law or anything! I or Lord Obama will continue to tell you what laws are and are not allowed to be followed!
FUBO & FUEH!
7 posted on
06/25/2013 12:26:31 PM PDT by
ExTxMarine
(PRAYER: It's the only HOPE for real CHANGE in America!)
To: servo1969
The Supreme Court ruled that current and future generations cannot be held to the failures of past generations and the left thinks this is a “set back?”
IOW, the left wants people to pay for any and all past perceived transgressions - FOREVER!!!! (See Paula Deen as a good example)
8 posted on
06/25/2013 12:30:14 PM PDT by
ExTxMarine
(PRAYER: It's the only HOPE for real CHANGE in America!)
To: servo1969
Well, the got it more right than before.
FU Eric Holder. Yuh Kommie Fascist...
10 posted on
06/25/2013 12:47:22 PM PDT by
Vendome
(Don't take life so seriously, you won't live through it anyway)
To: servo1969
Count on Holder to find an extra-legal way of nullifying the court’s decision...just like when Obama objected to the Citizens United decision and sicked the IRS on conservative groups.
To: servo1969
Whitey hater Holder speaks.
To: servo1969
Attorney General Eric Holder warned states against going too far. He said the Justice Department would not hesitate to take "swift" action against states looking to "take advantage" of the ruling. So the head lawyer of the US is now threatening states that obey a SCOTUS ruling........NOW can we impeach him?
15 posted on
06/25/2013 4:10:16 PM PDT by
Some Fat Guy in L.A.
(Still bitterly clinging to rational thought despite it's unfashionability)
To: servo1969; Perdogg; Lurking Libertarian; JDW11235; Clairity; TheOldLady; Spacetrucker; ...
FReepmail me to subscribe to or unsubscribe from the SCOTUS ping list.
16 posted on
06/25/2013 9:13:03 PM PDT by
BuckeyeTexan
(There are those that break and bend. I'm the other kind. ~Steve Earle)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson