Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Supreme Court strikes down part of Voting Rights Act
NBC News ^ | June 24, 2013 | Pete Williams and Erin McClam

Posted on 06/25/2013 7:40:20 AM PDT by NotYourAverageDhimmi

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-93 last
To: Wurlitzer

“A 5-4 victory in the highest court in the nation is NO victory for the owners of this country, us.”

It’s a lot better than the law being fully upheld. The days of the leftists on the Supreme Court actually ruling based on law and the Constitution ended with FDR. We will simply never get that back. The only other option is to do our best to keep the leftists off of the court, and that is not easy.


81 posted on 06/25/2013 12:19:17 PM PDT by BobL (To us it's a game, to them it's personal - therefore they win.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: BobL

You missed my point my FR Friend, I was not even debating the merit of the split decision, but the complete lack of confidence we should have in the endless stream of 5-4 decisions.

Remember, we were told by our wonderful elected officials how brilliant these USSC judges are yet they seem completely incapable of agreeing on what our laws should be or mean!

Tell me how “Ignorance of the Law” is not excuse for the average citizen while it seems to be the modus operandi of the USSC.


82 posted on 06/25/2013 12:24:03 PM PDT by Wurlitzer (Nothing says "ignorance" like Islam! 969)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 81 | View Replies]

To: NotYourAverageDhimmi

Oh, so congress is now able to create voting districts containing more democrats than republicans.


83 posted on 06/25/2013 1:05:30 PM PDT by macglencoe (You see what the left hand is doing, but you should be watching the right hand.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NotYourAverageDhimmi

Texas just reinstated it’s voter ID law and redistricting !

WOOT !!!

I LOVE my State !

Fixed everything in less than a few hours after the SC decision!


84 posted on 06/25/2013 2:29:18 PM PDT by TexasFreeper2009 (Obama lied .. the economy died.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Boogieman
Are you sure about that? It sounded to me like they still have to get approval, but that Congress must update the formula which determines which states much seek approval.

Since there is now no formula for determining who is covered by Section 5, at this point in time, no one is covered by Section 5. Unless and until Congress creates a new set of criteria to identify those who fall under Section 5 (and those criteria must be based on current conditions), no one is required to get pre-clearance. Now, the DoJ can still sue after the fact if they think a state makes a change that is discriminatory, but the burden of proof is now on the DoJ, not on the states.

85 posted on 06/25/2013 2:35:38 PM PDT by CA Conservative (Texan by birth, Californian by circumstance)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 62 | View Replies]

To: Soul of the South

That Bush signature had like 95 percent support within the hapless GOP too.


86 posted on 06/25/2013 3:17:52 PM PDT by Theodore R. ("Hey, the American people must all be crazy out there!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: NotYourAverageDhimmi

This truly is one of those “What difference does it make?” rulings. Elections are not legitimate. Every single person could stay home on election day and obama would still get millions of votes.


87 posted on 06/25/2013 3:37:26 PM PDT by VerySadAmerican
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GenXteacher

BTTT


88 posted on 06/25/2013 3:41:18 PM PDT by onyx (Please Support Free Republic - Donate Monthly! If you want on Sarah Palin's Ping List, Let Me know!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: NotYourAverageDhimmi; All

What this means before people get all ticked off is that most likely they won’t be able to enforce section 5 ever again because Congress won’t be able to agree to a remedy. Good news.


89 posted on 06/25/2013 3:49:37 PM PDT by rwfromkansas ("Carve your name on hearts, not marble." - C.H. Spurgeon)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: tanknetter

I really don’t see this being an effective issue for them. Would be shocked.


90 posted on 06/25/2013 3:52:56 PM PDT by rwfromkansas ("Carve your name on hearts, not marble." - C.H. Spurgeon)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: NotYourAverageDhimmi

Does this mean we can get rid of social engineering called gerrymandering and maybe finally get rid of idiots like Sheila Jackson Lee?


91 posted on 06/25/2013 3:57:15 PM PDT by Old Yeller (Cracker Barrel is racist and I demand that they change their name.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NotYourAverageDhimmi

Freepers beware.

They’re throwing a bone to conservatives to appease us for the treachery that is coming later in the week.


92 posted on 06/25/2013 9:14:34 PM PDT by Ghost of Philip Marlowe (Prepare for survival.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CA Conservative

Well, I guess that’s good. I’m just automatically skeptical and figure that any decision coming out of this SC is probably fundamentally flawed in some way.


93 posted on 06/26/2013 6:38:51 AM PDT by Boogieman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 85 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-93 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson