Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: fishtank

I was going to claim that the stegasaurus never existed but that was the triceratops. But the carving isn’t necessarily a stegasaurus, it may be a small reptile that went extinct during the Angkor Wat days, which isn’t that long ago. People back then were very busy building canals and reservoirs to double the growing season for rice to feed the ever increasing population. A lot of earth was moved, some land was drained and other places were flooded. I can see some animals going extinct.

But the most mysterious thing about the carving is that it is the only one. Something as awesome as a huge stegasaurus should have been in more artwork. And I would have expected it to be depicted in Indian or Chinese art even if the animal lived only in the Khmer region. Very strange.


13 posted on 06/24/2013 9:20:32 AM PDT by RadiationRomeo (Step into my mind and glimpse the madness that is me)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: RadiationRomeo

Agree.


17 posted on 06/24/2013 9:30:34 AM PDT by AEMILIUS PAULUS (It is a shame that when these people give a riot)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson