[Cboldt]

They are still available to the defense. I don’t see a great use for them, off the top of my head, but they can be called.

[Gay State Conservative]

They are still available to the defense.

Was that states in the article? (I didn't click the link) One might think that,in the interest of "fairness" that if the judge bars one side from calling a certain type of "expert" the same ban would apply to the other side as well.Unless,perhaps,the judge doubted the expertise of a *particular individual*.

I don’t see a great use for them, off the top of my head, but they can be called.

One might think that research has been done at various universities,perhaps even prestigious ones (MIT,Harvard Medical School,etc) on the human voice and voice recognition that could be applied to a matter like this.If my hunch is correct the only thing that might call the "science" into question is if respected researchers have reached substantially different conclusions in their work.

[Tula Git]

"They are still available to the defense. I don’t see a great use for them, off the top of my head, but they can be called."

oooo..I wouldn't open THAT door.