Interesting, though, that this particular memo was written on June 1, 2012. That was when some of us were realizing that the HI state registrar had just confirmed to AZ SOS Ken Bennett that Obama’s HI BC is non-valid. And particularly interesting because it appears that the HDOH created a new BC for Obama so he could have the BC# that was on the forged COLB that he had put online - using as a legal basis a request by law enforcement (Janet Napolitano or Eric HOlder?) who said it was necessary in order to protect Obama’s life. Which makes it a “national security” secret.
This applies to federal agencies, but if there is a Certificate of Naturalization for Obama, for instance, that would further corroborate what the HI registrar disclosed, that could be known by workers within a federal agency.
Have you been following the Beck/Taize whistleblower Possible trip to NY state Capitol. AG would handle fraud cases. Documentation possibly on file while he was a student in NYC. Don’t know if naturalization papers would be there!
Obama was issued a copy of his Certificate of Naturalization in 1983. It is not classified nor is it a national security interest. Obama may show the document to anyone he chooses and he may choose not to show it to anyone.
Anyone who has seen the document with Obama’s permission has not violated a law or posed a threat to national security. The Department of Homeland Security is the custodian of all U.S. immigration records. Employees of DHS who have seen the document are prohibited by law of disclosing the contents of records held by DHS due to the Privacy Act.
An eyewitness to Obama’s Certificate of Naturalization is only relevant to the Court in a civil procedure if a complaint gets to the discovery phase and the custodian of the record deny its existence or claim it cannot be found. The eyewitness is called as a rebuttal witness to testify they have examined the document or a certified copy with the permission of the subject.
Unfortunately, cases concerning Obama’s Certificate of Naturalization do not get to discovery. Some people believe an affidavit or an uncertified copy of the document will get the case to discovery. That’s not true. Allegations in a complaint for a civil matter are considered to be true. For example, the plaintiff alleges the defendant is ineligible to be POTUS. The Court proceeds with the understanding the defendant is ineligible for POTUS without examining any affidavits or uncertified copies. Even though the Court proceeds with the understanding the defendant is ineligible, the case is dismissed for various reasons.
Consequently, the focus should be on getting a case to discovery and not obtaining rogue copies from disgruntled employees. This is what Obama’s defenders are focusing on. As long as a case doesn’t make it to discovery, then he is safe. If a case makes it to discovery, then Obama’s only choice will be to resign or ignore the subpoena.