Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: SheLion; Eric Blair 2084; -YYZ-; 31R1O; 383rr; AFreeBird; AGreatPer; Alamo-Girl; Alia; altura; ...

Nanny State PING!


2 posted on 06/20/2013 5:55:18 PM PDT by Tolerance Sucks Rocks (Drag Me From Hell!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Tolerance Sucks Rocks

Sorry, but I disagree.

That high-calorie beverages are a nutritional disaster is clearly established.

Which doesn’t mean the government should be banning them. People have the right to make stupid decisions, and it’s not the government’s business to try to stop them.

But there’s a huge difference between the government forbidding people to do something stupid and the government deciding not to pay people to do something stupid.


7 posted on 06/20/2013 6:02:48 PM PDT by jdege
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: Tolerance Sucks Rocks
Nanny state

The nanny state part is the food stamps. Since soda is not food I don't see why my tax dollar should be used to provide food stamps and then they're used on stuff with negative nutritional value.

What's the solution? Put US citizens back to work so they can afford their own food. And send home non-citizens who aren't self-sufficient enough to feed themselves.

12 posted on 06/20/2013 6:10:51 PM PDT by grania
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: Tolerance Sucks Rocks

Thanks for the ping!


25 posted on 06/20/2013 7:11:28 PM PDT by Alamo-Girl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson