More pseudoscience from the Institute of Creative Imagination.
Did you even read the article? The author presents a very good argument that given the blend of animals and the setting in which they were found it’s extremely unlikely that they were fossilized the way that secular psuedoscientists postulate. He then concludes that the Bible presents a very feasible explanation that matches very well with the evidence presented in this book.
What’s your guess as to how these fossils were made?
I read the article - twice. It’s the typical Brian Thomas M.S. codswallop that in the minds of the un-, mis-, and poorly- informed passes for critical review. It’s comical, willful ignorance and the height of arrogance for him to cite Steve Donovan as a source to dispute the well understood processes of fossilization; Thomas is simply out of his intellectual and academic league.
It is not science to simply proclaim that one doesn’t believe the well supported evidence of Earth’s history because it conflicts with one’s theological view - to be taken seriously you have to go beyond saying, “Nope. God did it and everyone who actually studies this stuff is wrong.”
If you want to know how fossils are made, read one of Donovan’s books, and then start going through his countless other publications - but don’t buy into any of the crap that comes out of the ICR.