Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Right rips Rubio as Republican immigration votes slip away
The Hill ^

Posted on 06/19/2013 5:35:59 PM PDT by Sub-Driver

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-87 next last
To: FlingWingFlyer
I’d like to help but Juan McCain and his little buddy, the Flakester are beyond hope. They’re both ready for the loony bin.

This is how purple my state of AZ has become.
41 posted on 06/19/2013 7:03:30 PM PDT by Cheerio (Barry Hussein Soetoro-0bama=The Complete Destruction of American Capitalism)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver

Don’t vote for it, Marco.


42 posted on 06/19/2013 7:06:13 PM PDT by SoFloFreeper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PapaNew
Well, I’m not too sure anymore about Rubio (I thought he was the real deal, now I’m not so sure) but I’m not in agreement with the conservative “party line” on immigration either. I’m a libertarian in belief and a Republican in party, so I guess that makes me a feewheelin’ boy - free enough to believe and stand for what I believe American values are all about: life, liberty, and the freedom to pursue your dreams without government interference (or “help”).

Libertarianism in the economic sphere is only sustainable when other voters are libertarians like you. Amnesty will conjure up millions of new voters from Latin American countries who think Chavez-style socialism is the answer. The reality is that the people we're importing from the region vote overwhelmingly Democratic, which is what you'd expect from people who are eligible for Federally-mandated ethnic quotas, which are Jim Crow in reverse. Southerners supported Jim Crow for close to a century because it provided concrete benefits. Why would we expect Hispanics to react any differently?

43 posted on 06/19/2013 7:07:05 PM PDT by Zhang Fei (Let us pray that peace be now restored to the world and that God will preserve it always.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: Slambat

Suit yourself, but if we escape this damn campaign of his unscathed I don’t want him in a position to wreak this kind of damage on this country again.


44 posted on 06/19/2013 7:07:13 PM PDT by skeeter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: skeeter
60 votes are too-damn-many.

Exactly! We've done a very good job but it's not over yet. Keep posting the emails, contact lists & petitions.

45 posted on 06/19/2013 7:13:50 PM PDT by tsowellfan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: americas.best.days...

Can’t take credit—P.J. O’Rouke said it. (had a book by that name, I think.)

But, it FITS, doesn’t it?


46 posted on 06/19/2013 7:16:17 PM PDT by Mortrey (Impeach President Soros)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver
Striking a deal with Corker and Hoeven on increasing border patrol agents by as many as 20,000 may not bring a flood of Republican votes, but at least it would secure the support of those two lawmakers.

Means nothing. Even if 20,000 more BP agents were authorized, the president and executive branch still has to hire and deploy new agents. There were increases authorized which W never hired and deployed.

Anyone placing bets that Obama would hire and effectively utilize 20,000 more BP agents?

A physical fence is about the only thing that, once in place, the politicians can't remove whenever they feel like it. And it would actually be effective.

47 posted on 06/19/2013 7:16:44 PM PDT by Will88
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: clintonh8r

Meanwhile in CT, Murphy’s staff will just hang up on you if you if you dare disagree.


48 posted on 06/19/2013 7:19:30 PM PDT by matt04
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Mortrey

P.J. O’Rourke...sorry. So pissed, I can’t spell!


49 posted on 06/19/2013 7:19:39 PM PDT by Mortrey (Impeach President Soros)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver

61 or 62 fools.


50 posted on 06/19/2013 7:21:49 PM PDT by Williams (No Obama)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver
the Gang of Eight are mulling an increase of 20,000 border patrol agents along the southern border. This would nearly double the number of agents along the U.S.-Mexico border.<<

Will they fund the “Welcome Wagons” for 20k new agents too?....No need for new agents when the policy is Welcome to America!

51 posted on 06/19/2013 7:23:58 PM PDT by M-cubed
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Will88

I have been reading about the vitriol which the pro immigration groups launch at anyone who wants to secure the border. The plan is to do the exact opposite, this is all ridiculous.


52 posted on 06/19/2013 7:24:04 PM PDT by Williams (No Obama)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: Joe Bfstplk

Allen West!!


53 posted on 06/19/2013 7:26:51 PM PDT by M-cubed
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver

I hope the house passes a tiny immigration bill with some widely agreed upon fixes.

These mega “comprehensive bills” are a disaster.

Interesting how Rubio says one thing on Spanish TV in spanish, and then says something totally different to conservatives. How can anyone ever trust him again.


54 posted on 06/19/2013 7:28:44 PM PDT by Mount Athos (A Giant luxury mega-mansion for Gore, a Government Green EcoShack made of poo for you)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mr. Jeeves
Sarah Palin endorsed him, so he fooled a lot of people.

I'm not so sure. I knew from reading here at FR that Flake supported amnesty while he was still in the House, and definitely while he was running for the senate.

Arizona reelected the biggest amnesty pushing senator of all and then elected another to go with him after Kyl retired.

55 posted on 06/19/2013 7:29:02 PM PDT by Will88
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: Williams
61 or 62 fools disloyal Americans.
56 posted on 06/19/2013 7:29:44 PM PDT by Ray76 (Do you reject Obama? And all his works? And all his empty promises?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: headstamp 2

And they’ll be forbidden to check immigration status of anybody or deport them anyway. Holder’s job is to make sure that laws are not enforced.


57 posted on 06/19/2013 7:56:13 PM PDT by butterdezillion (,)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: butterdezillion
And they’ll be forbidden to check immigration status of anybody or deport them anyway. Holder’s job is to make sure that laws are not enforced.

If you have a large influx of illegals in your neighborhood, see if they suddenly start throwing off their hoodies, standing up straight and looking you in the eye. The ones I've seen in my environs have looked like the stereotypical border jumpers: bundled up in zippered sweatshirts with a baseball cap underneath and a backpack on their back. Will all that change as word works itself through the grapevine that the way is clear?

58 posted on 06/19/2013 8:01:12 PM PDT by thecodont
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver; Liz; cripplecreek; Tennessee Nana; TADSLOS; ding_dong_daddy_from_dumas; Gilbo_3; ...
RE :”Sen. Marco Rubio (R-Fla.) is feeling the heat as potential GOP allies are now turning against his immigration reform bill.
Republican colleagues who were previously viewed as possible “yes” votes are keeping their distance from the 1,075-page measure. .....
Potential Senate Republican backing for the legislation has begun to evaporate because of deep skepticism over its border-security and enforcement provisions.
In recent weeks, senators on both sides of the aisle speculated that 70 members of the upper chamber might vote for the Senate bill. That tally is now seen as unattainable.
Republican Sens. Mitch McConnell (Ky.), Rand Paul (Ky.) and John Cornyn (Texas), who were once viewed as possible supporters of the bill, are now expected to reject it.
Rubio, a possible 2016 presidential candidate, is seen as essential to passing the measure, but his involvement hasn’t persuaded many of his GOP colleagues to back it.
Many GOP senators say they want far more border-security provisions in the bill. “

Maybe they are not as dumb as they seemed.

Although I always expected McConnell and Rand Paul to reject it so that is not any surprise.

59 posted on 06/19/2013 8:03:22 PM PDT by sickoflibs (To GOP : Any path to US citizenship IS putting them ahead in line. Stop lying about your position.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Slambat

>> Could this be Rubios plan all along.

Not a chance.


60 posted on 06/19/2013 8:04:31 PM PDT by Gene Eric (Don't be a statist!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-87 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson