Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: ShadowAce

I’d quibble a bit with the implied premise that changing elevators is such an absolute deal breaker. Speaking personally, I think I’d find it kind of a cool thing to do.

I just can’t quite imagine the conversation “Yeah - we could have built a building that was X meters but decided not to because it would have required passengers to change elevators.”


7 posted on 06/18/2013 12:21:45 PM PDT by 2 Kool 2 Be 4-Gotten
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: 2 Kool 2 Be 4-Gotten

Its not the changing, its the added cost per square foot for effective usable space.


14 posted on 06/18/2013 12:28:03 PM PDT by Raycpa
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]

To: 2 Kool 2 Be 4-Gotten
I’d quibble a bit with the implied premise that changing elevators is such an absolute deal breaker. Speaking personally, I think I’d find it kind of a cool thing to do.

could simply transfer to the next tier elevator every 500 meters. At 4 meters per story that is every 125 stories.

51 posted on 06/18/2013 1:36:43 PM PDT by LoneRangerMassachusetts (The meek shall not inherit the Earth)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson