Meh.
I won’t vote for him.
Not even against Hitlery.
Maybe it’s better that they turn up the heat all at once, like the demonRATS will, than to slowly cook us like the RINOs will.
I’m afraid though that the Republican primary voters will back Jebbie because they have “heard of him”, he is a Bush, and he “is qualified.” Of course those voters are to gullible to be deciding anything, but anything goes now.
” I won’t vote for him.
Not even against Hitlery.”
Jeb doesn’t care. His job is to destroy our sovereignty, just like W.
Same here. I'd rather have an up-front enemy as president rather than a skulking back-stabbing traitor.
Good, because there's no such thing as voting "against" a candidate. And sorry, folks, but voting for Candidate A is NOT the equivalent of voting "against" Candidate B. You may think it is, you may wish it is, you may rationalized until you're blue in the face that it is, but voting for Candidate A is ONLY voting for Candidate A. On any ballot anywhere, you only ever get to vote FOR something. There is no such thing as voting "against," unless you believe in unicorns.
You don't even get to vote against a ballot proposition. You only get to vote FOR nixing it. There is no such thing as voting "against." Now, if our ballot had, for every candidate, the choice to vote FOR him/her or FOR nixing him/her, that would be different -- you could more accurately say you were voting "against" that candidate. But voting FOR the opponent is only that -- in the end, the only thing that matters is what you voted FOR. There is no such thing as voting against. It is a hard, ruthless, cold fact of math.