Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: AuH2ORepublican

, but he is correct that the Constitution does not require that the government get a warrant first.

The fourth Amendment quoted above clearly states that probable cause is required for a warrant to be issued. There is nothing in the amendment that indicates that there is ever a situation that allows a search or seizure without a warrant.


40 posted on 06/17/2013 5:21:05 AM PDT by freedomfiter2 (Brutal acts of commission and yawning acts of omission both strengthen the hand of the devil.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies ]


To: freedomfiter2

“There is nothing in the amendment that indicates that there is ever a situation that allows a search or seizure without a warrant.”


Actually, there is nothing in the Fourth Amendment or elsewhere in the Constitution that requires that a warrant be issued before a search or seizure takes place. The Framers didn’t want warrants to be issued; they placed restrictions on when warrants could be issued, because warrants allowed officers of the state to escape liability for their searches and seizures. But warrantless searches have always been permitted, so long as they are reasonable, and they occur every day.


54 posted on 06/17/2013 6:30:27 AM PDT by AuH2ORepublican (If a politician won't protect innocent babies, what makes you think that he'll defend your rights?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson