To: wouldilie
Obama: “ Now, where is that red line again.....”
He wont do jack squat about it.
The question is: Where did Syria get these weapons? Did they make them, or are they from Saddam Hussein’s stock?
4 posted on
06/13/2013 2:37:13 PM PDT by
exit82
("The Taliban is on the inside of the building" E. Nordstrom 10-10-12)
To: exit82
28 posted on
06/13/2013 2:55:38 PM PDT by
Zeppelin
(Keep on FReepin' on...)
To: exit82
Of course they were Saddam’s! If Assad had them, then we can be positive Saddam would have had them, too. If Assad didn’t get them until Saddam was being overthrown, then there is nowhere else he could have gotten them. We already know semi-trucks were going across to Syria bringing cash, luxury items AND weapons. Only a fool (hello, Liberals) still thinks Iraq’s WMDs were the lies of the Bush Administration.
31 posted on
06/13/2013 2:58:20 PM PDT by
boatbums
(God is ready to assume full responsibility for the life wholly yielded to Him.)
To: exit82
Syria has an advanced chemical and biological weapons program.
More than likely, the weapons were of Syrian design/manufacture, but “leftovers” from Saddam can’t be ruled out. Just ask James Clapper, who made that claim back in 2003
To: exit82
i’d wait and see, more than likely, this would be the excuse used to aid the other side.
42 posted on
06/13/2013 4:58:16 PM PDT by
VAFreedom
(maybe i should take a nap before work)
To: exit82
That’s the first thing I thought. After years of denying Sadam’s chemical weapon’s stash was moved to Syria, Bammy’s shocked, SHOCKED I tell ya’, that the Syrians are using chemical weapons.
This Marine mom says let the mid-east sort itself out. Even if there was a way to distinguish the good guys from the bad guys over there, this country will not support it’s military in the effort.
43 posted on
06/13/2013 7:10:11 PM PDT by
keats5
(Not all of us are hypnotized.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson