Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: OneWingedShark

We’re dealing with a matter that is fundamental and indispensible. When the oath is sworn, as Article Six requires of all officers of government in this country, in every branch, at every level, the core of that oath involves the securing of the lives, the liberty, the property of every individual, and the sovereignty, security, borders, and independence of the whole people. It’s a shared duty. It’s why we have a Union, and why we have a Constitution. It is the raison d’etre of this free republic, and the reason for the existence of each and every office within it.

“We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable rights, that among these are life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness. That to secure these rights, governments are instituted among men...”

— The Declaration of Independence

The Constitution gives special duties in this regard to the President of the United States, and as you rightfully pointed out, the state constitutions give special responsibilities to the Governors.

But, fundamentally, the right and duty of self-protection and self-preservation is, as Samuel Adams and the Committees of Correspondence pointed out, the first law of nature.


40 posted on 06/13/2013 4:36:24 PM PDT by EternalVigilance (John Boehner and the Republican Party: A wholly-owned subsidiary of Democrats, Inc.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies ]


To: EternalVigilance; OneWingedShark
What is the individual citizen's relationship with our government? Are the statements in the Constitution similar to a binding contract or covenant with duties and responsibilities that must be fulfilled? What are the consequences if they are not? In other words, when is the contract or a section of the contract rendered void? (I'm not a lawyer or a Constitutional expert by any means, I'm just trying to learn.)

And I'm not looking for the pat “Tree of liberty...”quotes. Just wondering when it is that part of a contract has been breached, then is the offended party free to go on and fulfill that requirement in some other way? Even if the Supreme court says, no, you can't do that... when can the state legislatures/governor just ignore and task the State militias to begin securing the border because the Federal government has broken their side of the contract?


We’re dealing with a matter that is fundamental and indispensible. When the oath is sworn, as Article Six requires of all officers of government in this country, in every branch, at every level, the core of that oath involves the securing of the lives, the liberty, the property of every individual, and the sovereignty, security, borders, and independence of the whole people. It’s a shared duty. It’s why we have a Union, and why we have a Constitution. It is the raison d’etre of this free republic, and the reason for the existence of each and every office within it.

“We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable rights, that among these are life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness. That to secure these rights, governments are instituted among men...”

— The Declaration of Independence

The Constitution gives special duties in this regard to the President of the United States, and as you rightfully pointed out, the state constitutions give special responsibilities to the Governors.

But, fundamentally, the right and duty of self-protection and self-preservation is, as Samuel Adams and the Committees of Correspondence pointed out, the first law of nature.

46 posted on 06/13/2013 7:53:04 PM PDT by boxlunch (Psalm 2)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson