Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Perdogg

Interesting ruling. Think their logic is flawed, though. If DNA cannot be patented because it is nature, then cDNA should not be either. cDNA is just the DNA version of the mRNA which is also nature.


3 posted on 06/13/2013 7:46:40 AM PDT by Rokurota
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Rokurota

They can’t patent it, but the Supremes also just ruled last week, including Thomas surprisingly, that the law can swab your DNA and store it right along with your NSA files.


9 posted on 06/13/2013 8:12:27 AM PDT by A'elian' nation
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: Rokurota
Without reading the decision it looks like they allowed a patent for a process ~ after all, cDNA needs a process. A second process would be x'DNA; another y''DNA, etc.

That's not exactly new law ~ rather like the dispute over the patent on automobiles by George B. Selden. Henry Ford beat him like wet rug.

11 posted on 06/13/2013 8:16:30 AM PDT by muawiyah (Git yer Red STATE Arm Bands here - $29.95 - NOT SOLD IN STORES - TAX FREE)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson