Paul is supposed to be the rebel who refuses to tow the GOP-e line. So why is he jumping on board the amnesty bandwagon? The GOP-e is in the pocket of big business who want cheap labour and because they cynically think they can swing a few hispanic votes through appeasement. What’s Paul’s excuse?
I’m not sure, it’s been one of the few things that’s been having me scratch my head about.
I can even understand if he towed the full (L) line, AKA: full open borders. But, that usually necessitates 1) removing the anti-A1S8 laws 2) removing the ‘safety net’
Nothing to give = nothing to attract = Constitutional
Most else, he’s done more than 99% of the rest in D.C., and for that I am grateful. This....I don’t know