To: SecondAmendment
They wouldn’t be able to justify domestic spying if our borders were protected and we weren’t importing terrorists.
28 posted on
06/10/2013 10:08:01 AM PDT by
cripplecreek
(REMEMBER THE RIVER RAISIN!)
To: cripplecreek
...importing terrorists...
Could it be any clearer? Seriously!
35 posted on
06/10/2013 10:10:46 AM PDT by
DoughtyOne
(Obama lied, four men died, and he went to hide...)
To: cripplecreek
> They wouldn’t be able to justify domestic spying if our borders were protected and we weren’t importing terrorists. DING DING DING DING !!!
WE HAVE A WINNER!
44 posted on
06/10/2013 10:13:37 AM PDT by
SecondAmendment
(Restoring our Republic at 9.8357x10^8 FPS)
To: cripplecreek
Indeed. How can I buy into any “concerns” this government has about security, when they not only allow but virtually facillitate open borders? I’m rather apt to believe their notions and interest in security only involves their own corrupt political class, not that of that of the American people.
56 posted on
06/10/2013 10:25:45 AM PDT by
greene66
To: cripplecreek
86 posted on
06/10/2013 10:53:23 AM PDT by
bmwcyle
(People who do not study history are destine to believe really ignorant statements.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson