Posted on 06/09/2013 1:47:50 PM PDT by Cold Case Posse Supporter
Here are 185 examples of Barack Obama’s lying, lawbreaking, corruption, cronyism, etc.
“Where is the proof that she was pregnant? Nobody ever saw her as such.”
The US Government and the U. of Hawaii knew Stanley Ann was impregnated by BHO Sr. as of April 1961 according to the INS FOIA documents and disclosed that there was active discussion of turning baby Barry over to the Salvation Army. Those documents explicitly anticipated Stanley Ann going to Seattle to attend college after giving birth.
These INS FOIA documents DESTROY Barry’s life narrative so IMO there is a near ZERO chance that these documents were forged disinformation.
“The US Government and the U. of Hawaii knew Stanley Ann was impregnated by BHO Sr...”
CORRECTION: The US Government and the U. of Hawaii knew Stanley Ann was pregnant and dropped out, reported a claim of a marriage to BHO Sr. on Feb 2, 1961 and had reasons to believe she was impregnated by BHO Sr. Who that actual sperm donor was is still open to speculation.
He's not a heckler, he's a REALIST.
If your neighbor came over and raped your daughter EVERY DAY for SEVEN YEARS, and the police did nothing, would you still have the optimistic attitude that SOON, ANY DAY NOW, they would actually DO SOMETHING?
Here's a list of Obama's crimes. Nothing has been done for SEVEN YEARS (well, longer than that because he was committing criminal acts as a Senator).
Here are 185 examples of Barack Obama’s lying, lawbreaking, corruption, cronyism, etc.
When is Obama going to be removed from Office ?
Well... that ship sailed already. They simply ignored the Constitution.
You expect the very people who ALLOWED this to happen in the first place to suddenly admit THEY LIED AND IGNORED THE CONSTITUTION ?
Don't you think THEY KNEW ALL THIS before he became President ?
Yup, that’s NS and all his other zotted aliases. Back here to his trolling duties.
The devils in “The Screwtape Letters” called themselves “realists”.
Hopeless defeatism is exactly what the dems/commies want us to feel. Woe is us, all is lost.
You think the dems/commies are defeatists? No, they are wicked fighters. Of course, fighting for evil. But on our side we need courage and fighting spirit, not “all is lost, we are doomed” defeatism.
Look, your script is predictable...it's the latest talking point.
When the topic first came up years ago, the script read by every detractor was the same: "We just can't talk about this...they will all think we are crazy and you will give FR a bad name".
When there was enough evidence where it was becoming plain as day, the scripted talking point used by everyone, media and fellow detractors of yours: "This is taking away from the elections...let's all concentrate on beating him at the polls. That's the ticket.
Now, every detractor repeats your line, like Glum from Gulliver's Travels..."What difference does it make...nothing is going to happen anyway".
I've heard ya...many times over the years and yet I am still a proud birther.
Unless I’m mistaken *nobody* is denying the fact that Osama Obama is a US citizen.My understanding is that under Federal laws in effect at the time he was a US citizen from the moment of birth *regardless* of where he was born.I think the issue is is he a natural born citizen as required by the Constitution to serve as President.
The problem with your statement above is that you are assuming that the info on the forged documents, and the myths in his fake autobiography, are true.
Since it is clear his docs (the few seen) are forged, and the rest hidden/scrubbed etc, then only a fool accepts the info on said forgeries as true. Assuming that Stanley Ann Dunham is his mother is a dead end - any verification, other than propaganda and forgeries? nope.
No one (in public) knows who his parents are, his DoB, place of birth, or original birth name. Nothing should be accepted since there is no verification.
He may be a US citizen, he may not. Until you and everyone else knows the real facts of his identity, making stupid assumptions based on propaganda and then drawing conclusions is worse than a waste of time, it is a dead end.
That is why Zullo and Arpaio are doing great work. One step at a time.
Well thank you. Done.
I have been saying this all along. Why would anyone fly to Hawaii to pick up a PDF file? It didn't happen. That is huge!
ok well why not just listen and ignore us if you disagree, you dont need to fight against us
find an issue to go after against obama that you do like, rather than spending your time going against people on your own side.
Of course. That's WHY we are here on FR fighting for his IMPEACHMENT and REMOVAL along with the rest of his cronies.
However, the facts support the case that NOTHING HAS been done in over SEVEN YEARS. Just because someone ACKNOWLEDGES that fact, and suspects the same will continue to happen doesn't make them a defeatist.
If they IMPEACH OBAMA, do you think he will be REMOVED from OFFICE ? Bill Clinton was IMPEACHED, and he STAYED in office. That is factual history.
Obama is surrounded with MORE PROTECTION NOW than BILL CLINTON was.
ALL OF US WANT OBAMA and his crooks/deviants/non-Americans OUT.... but is it happening ?
Didn't Susan Rice just get PROMOTED ? With examples like that, why do you criticize anyone who suspects there will just be more of the same?
Aren't we all ?
GSC is likely one as well. HOWEVER, Obama is still in office.
I read all GSC's posts (and everyone else's), so my question is... why are you just picking on GSC ? He's not the only one who suspects that MORE OF THE SAME will continue and that OBAMA won't be removed from office. I am sure that GSC would jump for joy if it happened. RUSH LIMBAUGH said he doesn't think Obama will be IMPEACHED or REMOVED from office. Do you think RUSH is a troll?
Remember, even BILL CLINTON didn't get removed from office.
Yes, we must keep up the fight. But those who are being REALISTIC don't deserve to be picked on as if they were somehow WANTING OBAMA to stay in office.
If you think GayStateConservative is a 'troll', and is trying to keep Obama in office, then you are COMPLETELY NUTS.
I see GSC's posts all the time. This thread is the first time I have seen anything from YOU.
I responded to a post on this thread out of the blue.I then received at least one reply to that post and since then it's been back and forth between me and several people...most being critics of my position and at least one being rather supportive.When people stop responding to me here I'll stop posting.So perhaps you'd want to encourage your "we'll show that Obama's a Kenyan fraud and remove him from office" friends to place me on their "pay no mind" list and it's case closed...as far as my participation is concerned at least.
GSC isn't fighting against you.
He has been called a TROLL, several times, and been TOLD by some posters that he should GET OFF FREE REPUBLIC.
One poster said only posters who agreed with him should post on FREE REPUBLIC, so that he could 'enjoy' what he read.
Isn't that 'censorship'. Isn't that the kind of CRAP that goes on over at DEMOCRATIC UNDERGROUND.
If you disagree with a poster (doesn't matter what the issue), can you not 'debate' the issue, rather than just tell them to 'go away'?
FR is an OPEN DISCUSSION FORUM. Doesn't that mean we DEBATE and DISCUSS? Doesn't that require DIFFERENT VIEWPOINTS ?
If you were on a thread discussing a subject and people told you to GO AWAY just because you disagreed with their opinion of the situation..... what would you do ?
One small correction to your post,UCANSEE2...there are two options in a case like this,civil debate with the "troll" or put him/her on your "pay no mind" list.Actually,I just thought of a third option...report the "troll" to the moderators who may,or may not ban the offender temporarily or permentmently.We all know of many folks who have experienced the "Viking kitties"...some of them are even old timers like me.
Trolls aren't civil (usually resort to personal attacks) and aren't interested in debate.
or put him/her on your "pay no mind" list.
Which I do, once they make it apparent they think this is FACEBOOK or TWITTER, or are trying to 'bait' posters into attacking them just to get them banned.
Actually,I just thought of a third option...report the "troll" to the moderators who may,or may not ban the offender temporarily or permentmently.
An option that I avoid. I feel everyone has a right to their opinion, especially if I disagree with them, and the only times I have resorted to punching the ABUSE button is when it is clear they are only interested in MAKING PERSONAL ATTACKS, because that's all they got.
I have probably punched ABUSE on my OWN POSTS more than for any other posters comments.
As a general practice I quit posting on the BC threads somewhere around early to mid 2012 precisely for the type of comments made by GSC. Hell for the most part, I had to quit reading them as well.
The threads go the same way without fail every time...someone posts a modicum of new intel, the wet blanket gets thrown on the enthusiasm by about response 2 in each posting and the whole concept of info gathering/sharing was gone. 99% of the threads are lost to off topic arguments like this one.
I'll admit to getting a little excited about this post though...It seemed to have some interesting possibilities...some legs. And yes I expected the scripted stuff here and there, but as I read on and on I just kept seeing the defeatist attitude repeated time and again and it breaks my heart as well as my spirit. I cannot speak for others but it does make one wonder how many others feel the same.
This is a big war being fought, and every battle has so far been lost, right? I get it...so let's just do what General Washington did when he lost every battle - hang it up and let the troops go home............oh, wait!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.