Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

PICTURES: Why Norway wants the Joint Strike Missile
Flight Global ^ | June 6, 2013 | Craig Hoyle

Posted on 06/06/2013 2:24:33 PM PDT by sukhoi-30mki

PICTURES: Why Norway wants the Joint Strike Missile

Remember the fuss that Norway made about not committing to buying Lockheed Martin's F-35 until it got a promise to have Kongsberg's Joint Strike Missile (JSM) integrated for anti-ship and land attack missions? Well, new images released by the nation's defence ministry today provide a hint at why its was so insistent.

The ship-launched Naval Strike Missile from which the JSM is being developed is now operational, following a successful (understatement of the week) firing performed from one of the navy's Skjold-class corvettes; possibly one of the coolest-looking surface vessels out there today.

As the images below show, the weapon's live warhead made a significant mess of the retired Oslo-class frigate which served as its target during the end-to-end test.

The missile struck the ship's main superstructure, as shown clearly in the shot below.

A critical design review for the air-launched JSM will be conducted this summer, with the weapon expected to become operational from around 2020. It is intended to be carried internally by the Royal Norwegian Air Force's future F-35As, or in a less stealthy configuration (which I'd suggest is probably acceptable from a healthy standoff range of about 150nm, or 277km) with up to two under each wing. Exports are also a clear target.



TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: aerospace; jsm; norway

1 posted on 06/06/2013 2:24:33 PM PDT by sukhoi-30mki
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: sukhoi-30mki

The crew on the ship would not be happy.


2 posted on 06/06/2013 2:27:15 PM PDT by EEGator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sukhoi-30mki

That’s pretty cool, but they would make me happier by simply making lots more Nokkelost and shipping it over here sometime soon.


3 posted on 06/06/2013 2:37:00 PM PDT by nesnah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sukhoi-30mki

Solid hit...I wonder if they can program it to hit closer to the waterline.


4 posted on 06/06/2013 2:37:50 PM PDT by Sergio (An object at rest cannot be stopped! - The Evil Midnight Bomber What Bombs at Midnight)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: EEGator

“The crew on the ship would not be happy.”

Understatement of the day.

Comparing the two pics of the ship, “how much” of the ship is missing? From the explosion pic, I’m amazed it didn’t sink. Probably no magazine or fuel onboard; just the missile payload.


5 posted on 06/06/2013 2:40:03 PM PDT by Carriage Hill (Guns kill people, pencils misspell words, cars drive drunk & spoons make you fat.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Sergio
Solid hit...I wonder if they can program it to hit closer to the waterline.

It has an imaging infrared seeker and an internal software library of target ships, so you can set it to hit whatever part of a ship that you like.

The hit in the picture would have rendered any ship a complete "mission kill;" it's not really necessary to sink a ship.

6 posted on 06/06/2013 2:40:46 PM PDT by Strategerist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: carriage_hill

You’re probably correct about it only being the payload exploding. That’s a hell of a blast. They’d certainly be dead in the water.


7 posted on 06/06/2013 2:46:45 PM PDT by EEGator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Strategerist

JSMs aren’t going to be very useful against Norway’s real enemy: its “immigrants”.


8 posted on 06/06/2013 2:47:28 PM PDT by AZLiberty (No tag today.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Strategerist

Tell it to the Japnese and the Crew of the USS Lexington.


9 posted on 06/06/2013 2:53:08 PM PDT by Kartographer ("We mutually pledge to each other our lives, our fortunes and our sacred honor.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: AZLiberty

Agree. And this is probably the best point that’s going to be made all day, maybe all week.


10 posted on 06/06/2013 3:01:02 PM PDT by OldNewYork (Biden '13. Impeach now.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: EEGator

Lotta debris flying thru the air, too. I didn’t expect that mush of the ship to be remaining in the 2nd pic, after seeing the 1st pic’s blast.


11 posted on 06/06/2013 3:05:42 PM PDT by Carriage Hill (Guns kill people, pencils misspell words, cars drive drunk & spoons make you fat.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: carriage_hill

Definitely, though it’s hard to tell how much of the ship is gone.


12 posted on 06/06/2013 3:06:58 PM PDT by EEGator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: sukhoi-30mki

They shoulda used a JSM Finnish IT Helsinkit.


13 posted on 06/06/2013 3:50:01 PM PDT by bunkerhill7 (("The Second Amendment has no limits on firepower"-NY State Senator Kathleen A. Marchione.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Strategerist

“mission kill”

I had not even thought of that. Shows how little I know about naval warfare. Thanks for the information.


14 posted on 06/10/2013 7:55:57 AM PDT by Sergio (An object at rest cannot be stopped! - The Evil Midnight Bomber What Bombs at Midnight)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson