It (the appellate court) ruled that Zimmermans attorneys may question Crump but only on a very narrow set of things. They may ask him about the contents of the interview and about the circumstances surrounding it
.
They may not, however, ask why he tracked her down or what methods he used to do that.
A small win, but not a complete one.
O’Mara has an ace. All he wants from her is “perjury”.
It is a small win but puts the court (the judge) on notice that she is prejudiced against Zimmerman and that the Appeals Court Unanimous decision makes it obvious.
Is there new information? I ask because I thought that there was no proof yet that this phone conversation ever actually took place.
After what came out in court this morning Bernie and Corey should be in handcuffs.
The real source file on the phone had 23 times more data than the source file that the prosecution turned over to the defense — 23 times.
Now they need to allow the Tweets and texts regarding his MMA-style fights, and his wanting to make victims “bleed” as much as possible.