Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

New all-solid sulfur-based battery outperforms lithium-ion technology
Physorg ^ | June 5, 2013

Posted on 06/05/2013 8:56:54 PM PDT by ckilmer

Scientists at the Department of Energy's Oak Ridge National Laboratory have designed and tested an all-solid lithium-sulfur battery with approximately four times the energy density of conventional lithium-ion technologies that power today's electronics.

The ORNL battery design, which uses abundant low-cost elemental sulfur, also addresses flammability concerns experienced by other chemistries.

"Our approach is a complete change from the current battery concept of two electrodes joined by a liquid electrolyte, which has been used over the last 150 to 200 years," said Chengdu Liang, lead author on the ORNL study published this week in Angewandte Chemie International Edition.

Scientists have been excited about the potential of lithium-sulfur batteries for decades, but long-lasting, large-scale versions for commercial applications have proven elusive. Researchers were stuck with a catch-22 created by the battery's use of liquid electrolytes: On one hand, the liquid helped conduct ions through the battery by allowing lithium polysulfide compounds to dissolve. The downside, however, was that the same dissolution process caused the battery to prematurely break down.

The ORNL team overcame these barriers by first synthesizing a never-before-seen class of sulfur-rich materials that conduct ions as well as the lithium metal oxides conventionally used in the battery's cathode. Liang's team then combined the new sulfur-rich cathode and a lithium anode with a solid electrolyte material, also developed at ORNL, to create an energy-dense, all-solid battery.

"This game-changing shift from liquid to solid electrolytes eliminates the problem of sulfur dissolution and enables us to deliver on the promise of lithium-sulfur batteries," Liang said. "Our battery design has real potential to reduce cost, increase energy density and improve safety compared with existing lithium-ion technologies."

The new ionically-conductive cathode enabled the ORNL battery to maintain a capacity of 1200 milliamp-hours (mAh) per gram after 300 charge-discharge cycles at 60 degrees Celsius. For comparison, a traditional lithium-ion battery cathode has an average capacity between 140-170 mAh/g. Because lithium-sulfur batteries deliver about half the voltage of lithium-ion versions, this eight-fold increase in capacity demonstrated in the ORNL battery cathode translates into four times the gravimetric energy density of lithium-ion technologies, explained Liang.

The team's all-solid design also increases battery safety by eliminating flammable liquid electrolytes that can react with lithium metal. Chief among the ORNL battery's other advantages is its use of elemental sulfur, a plentiful industrial byproduct of petroleum processing.

"Sulfur is practically free," Liang said. "Not only does sulfur store much more energy than the transition metal compounds used in lithium-ion battery cathodes, but a lithium-sulfur device could help recycle a waste product into a useful technology."

Although the team's new battery is still in the demonstration stage, Liang and his colleagues hope to see their research move quickly from the laboratory into commercial applications. A patent on the team's design is pending.

"This project represents a synergy between basic science and applied research," Liang said. "We used fundamental research to understand a scientific phenomenon, identified the problem and then created the right material to solve that problem, which led to the success of a device with real-world applications."


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Culture/Society; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: battery; sulfer
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-51 next last

1 posted on 06/05/2013 8:56:54 PM PDT by ckilmer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: ckilmer

Its hard to know what to make of these battery improvement announcements. There are so many of them. For example here is another one in physorg today.

Metal-free catalyst outperforms platinum in fuel cell
http://phys.org/news/2013-06-metal-free-catalyst-outperforms-platinum-fuel.html


2 posted on 06/05/2013 8:59:07 PM PDT by ckilmer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ckilmer

great news. i wonder how prone it is to catching on fire. and how hot it gets during recharging.


3 posted on 06/05/2013 9:02:51 PM PDT by Secret Agent Man (Gone Galt; Not averse to Going Bronson.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ckilmer

I call dibs on using the planet Venus as a battery and all sulfur mining operations from there.


4 posted on 06/05/2013 9:03:41 PM PDT by DannyTN
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ckilmer

I call dibs on using the planet Venus as a battery and all sulfur mining operations from there.


5 posted on 06/05/2013 9:03:41 PM PDT by DannyTN
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ckilmer

6 posted on 06/05/2013 9:05:45 PM PDT by HangnJudge
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DannyTN

Sulfur?

Clean Yellow Energy from H*ll. Temperature tolerant! Unlimited!


7 posted on 06/05/2013 9:09:51 PM PDT by Hardraade (http://junipersec.wordpress.com (Obama equals Osama))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: ckilmer

This is exciting. A transformational technology maybe.


8 posted on 06/05/2013 9:11:11 PM PDT by DariusBane (Liberty and Risk. Flip sides of the same coin. So how much risk will YOU accept?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ckilmer

This is hugh.


9 posted on 06/05/2013 9:12:11 PM PDT by Captain Jack Aubrey (There's not a moment to lose.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ckilmer

Wow, 4X is a big deal


10 posted on 06/05/2013 9:18:06 PM PDT by bigbob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ckilmer

I wish I had a dollar for every new battery technology that never made it to market.


11 posted on 06/05/2013 9:18:27 PM PDT by Moonman62 (The US has become a government with a country, rather than a country with a government.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

sfl


12 posted on 06/05/2013 9:24:13 PM PDT by phockthis (http://www.supremelaw.org/fedzone11/index.htm ...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Moonman62

Aren’t you just a ray of sunshine.


13 posted on 06/05/2013 9:29:54 PM PDT by toast
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: ckilmer

X4 energy density would bring human-pilot-on-board electric helicopters into reality. Fixed-wing aircraft also, undoubtedly.

Among many other things, some not so nice.


14 posted on 06/05/2013 9:42:38 PM PDT by Steely Tom (If the Constitution can be a living document, I guess a corporation can be a person.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Captain Jack Aubrey

“This is hugh.”

“Hugh”?? How about HUGE?


15 posted on 06/05/2013 9:52:19 PM PDT by BB62
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: BB62

It is SERIES too.


16 posted on 06/05/2013 9:53:49 PM PDT by PeaceBeWithYou (De Oppresso Liber! (50 million and counting in Afghanistan and Iraq))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Steely Tom

I can imagine one of those batteries in my remote control airplane. It would be screaming!


17 posted on 06/05/2013 9:55:19 PM PDT by jonrick46 (The opium of Communists: other people's money.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: ckilmer
From a chemical-electrical energy standpoint, this is a big leap in energy storage technology. Burning fuel in an internal combustion engine is horribly inefficient, wasting roughly 2/3 of the energy as exhaust heat and cooling system losses. For every gallon of gas you buy, 2/3 of that gallon literally gets wasted as useless low grade heat that does not propel your vehicle forward. Batteries are nice, but they just store energy, like fuel. A gallon of gas has the same amount of energy as all of the batteries in a chevy volt. The name of the game is energy density. The brass ring to grab for is to be able to store as much energy as it would take to move you the equivalent distance as a tank of gas, and do it more efficiently than just burning fuel. Fuel cells and batteries would work way better than gas, unless someone comes up with a fuel cell that uses hydrocarbons directly. If that were the case, then a 1000 miles on a tank of fuel for your Tahoe would be a piece of cake.
18 posted on 06/05/2013 10:22:32 PM PDT by factoryrat (We are the producers, the creators. Grow it, mine it, build it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BB62

It’s a old joke around here, in case you did not know..

Hugh, series, going to take a shower and a moose bit my sister are annecdotal posts that will be here until there is no here, here.


19 posted on 06/05/2013 10:36:20 PM PDT by Cold Heat (Have you reached your breaking point yet? If not now....then when?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: factoryrat
For every gallon of gas you buy, 2/3 of that gallon literally gets wasted as useless low grade heat that does not propel your vehicle forward.

Unless it is winter in North Dakota (and a few other states) --where that heat is life support.

20 posted on 06/05/2013 10:40:08 PM PDT by Smokin' Joe (How often God must weep at humans' folly. Stand fast. God knows what He is doing)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-51 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson