Posted on 06/05/2013 8:07:46 PM PDT by Rebelbase
“Far too many law enforcement officers are being harassed, injured, even killed while honoring their commitment to protect and serve this state.”
That’s what passes for reasoning among politicians. If the current situation is “far too many”, what is the proper number? If it’s zero, then good luck with that. How about first showing that there’s been some sort of increase that makes your bill necessary. Then the politician could set about showing just how his bill will “solve” the problem, without creating even more problems. They never, ever consider the unintended consequences of their “solutions”. Here’s a hint: THERE ARE NO SOLUTIONS. There are only trade-offs. The dimwit that proposed this bill has not thought for even a moment of the possible costs of his brainchild, only the wonderful benefits. Mainly, his name in the paper, and some endorsements.
> I thought it already was a crime.
Trust me, any cop with half a brain, can turn it into one...: )
Breach of peace, assault, public intoxication, disorderly conduct, etc...take your pick. Ex-LEO here...; )
Probably setting the stage for enforcement for the new brown shirt DHS civilian police force
I think we’re all discons walking down the street, waiting to happen.
Yep, that’s it: A cop grabs your camera—after he’s shot your Chihuahua—and you’ve committed aggravated annoyance, a felony.
You disrespected and/or harassed him or acted in a way that led to a situation that could result in injuries, most likely yours.
Yhe Internal Security Forces need this to do their work (whatever it is)
Well, the police officer. Except in court it'll be his word against yours...
I see. So when you're getting a speeding ticket and the officer is being a jerk... So you ask for the officer's badge number intending to report his/her behavior... He/she takes that as a "threat" - a threat to his/her career/job/etc. Bang, you are guilty of a felony? What a stupid law. Or maybe merely asking why you're getting the ticket, discussing (arguing) that the light was yellow, or that you did come to a full stop, or that the change in speed limits was not well marked...
Anything that "annoys" the officer can get you a felony rap? What a crock of hot, steaming fertilizer. This law is intended to do nothing but make felons out of otherwise law abiding citizens. This is pure control and intimidation, nothing else. FU NY.
So, when did us peasants become so low in the American caste system that our mere touch is a prosecutable felony?
Oh, I'm sorry - our "annoying" touch...
You have the right to remain silent. Even without this crazy law that is the best thing to do. Save the excuses and explanations, and share them with your lawyer.
I have advised my kids that they should keep their mouth shut, until they get a chance to talk to a lawyer. A good thing to remember to say is: I’m sure my lawyer wouldn’t want me to answer any questions at this time.
There goes another New York state Republican, charming the hell out of everyone again.
Tell me one member of the public that doesn’t annoy a cop when pulled over, or taken to task.
I see a 99.237% ticket rate for those who come into contact with the police.
What a great way to increase city income.
This seems like an Onion report.
Sissy boys...
Nancy gurlz .
A lot of cops were born annoyed.
“MOM! He’s looking at me!” Whaahhhh!!! No abuse potential in this little gem. NY is starting to make Massachusetts look sane... maybe not.
I’m pretty sure assaulting a cop is already a crime.
Better think twice before closing that donut shop . . .
There's no way to rule innocent men. The only power any government has is the power to crack down on criminals. Well, when there aren't enough criminals, one makes them. One declares so many things to be a crime that it becomes impossible for men to live without breaking laws. Who wants a nation of law-abiding citizens? What's there in that for anyone? But just pass the kind of laws that can neither be observed nor enforced nor objectively interpreted - and you create a nation of law-breakers - and then you cash in on guilt. Now, that's the system, Mr. Rearden, that's the game, and once you understand it, you'll be much easier to deal with." Beginning on page 411 of the 35th Anniversary Edition of Atlas Shrugged
I don’t think this:
“HE OR SHE STRIKES, SHOVES, KICKS OR OTHERWISE SUBJECTS SUCH PERSON TO PHYSICAL CONTACT.”
Applies to filming.
But it could say, if the officer got up close to the videographer and physical contact was made -somehow. And just like that, a class E felony.
Sounds to me it gives officers cover to initiate contact in order to have grounds for arresting an otherwise law-abiding person.
Next up whistles. When they blow the whistle you must drop to the ground and remain in the prone position until the all clear is given.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.