the other 305 can KMA
'...The age of nations must end....The governments of the nations have decided to order their separate sovereignities into one government to which they surrender their arms."
Interesting that the press has dropped the word “Small” from these reports and added a new acronym (ATT) to try to hide that change.
Propaganda pure and simple. Goebels wouldn’t be proud. He’d be envious.
Captain Johnny Parker said it best on Concord Green oh so many years ago, “If it’s war they want, let it begin here, let it begin now.”
Or rather the UN has made that change?
He is going to have the U.N. do it for him.
It's kind of like what the making of is , is
Both 0scumbag & Lurch should be charged, tried, convicted and stood against a stone wall, for treason, and ...
yes u have right answear
and toss the U.N. out of the U.S.!!!
The Supreme Court has already clarified the limits of the federal government's constitutonal authority to negotiate treaties in the favor of patriots.
More specifically, first note that the writings of Thomas Jefferson indicate that concern that the federal government might use its power to negotiate treaties to rob our constitutional protections is nothing new. In fact, based on his experience as vice president and therefore president of the Senate, Jefferson had officially clarified the limits of federal government power to negotiate treaties.
"In giving to the President and Senate a power to make treaties, the Constitution meant only to authorize them to carry into effect, by way of treaty, any powers they might constitutionally exercise." --Thomas Jefferson: The Anas, 1793."Surely the President and Senate cannot do by treaty what the whole government is interdicted from doing in any way." --Thomas Jefferson: Parliamentary Manual, 1812.
Next, reflecting on Jefferson's expert understanding of federal power to negotiate treaties, the Supreme Court has already officially clarified the following. Essentially the feds cannot use treaties as a back door to force US citizens to comply with foreign laws based on powers which the states have never delegated to Congress via the Constitution.
"2. Insofar as Art. 2(11) of the Uniform Code of Military Justice provides for the military trial of civilian dependents accompanying the armed forces in foreign countries, it cannot be sustained as legislation which is "necessary and proper" to carry out obligations of the United States under international agreements made with those countries, since no agreement with a foreign nation can confer on Congress or any other branch of the Government power which is free from the restraints of the Constitution (emphasis added)." --Reid v. Covert, 1956.
Only 130 are on record for being in opposition to this foul treaty. Sad. I hoped that at least half of our Congresscritters would be opposed to this dung pile.
“The United Nations Arms Trade Treaty (ATT) is scheduled to be signed by Barack Obama on June 4..”
That’s fine. Let the racist MF sign it until his Nazi fingers fall off.
I’m especially looking forward to the traitorous secret service goons trying to implement the UN treaty.
Barry doesn’t care what the Senate and Congress think. He’s gunning for UN Gen Sec after he gets finished destroying Amerika.
Article of Impeachment #1: President Obama failed to uphold his sworn oath to defend the constitution in that he furthered an intention to impose unlawful restraints to the RKBA guaranteed by the Second Amendment.
How about this instead? I oppose any UN treaty, period, case closed. Is that better?
I oppose any UN treaty PERIOD.
The UN needs to be disbanded or at the very least kicked out of the US.
US out of the UN, UN off US soil!