Two fold. He was supposed to be captured alive. You can find news leaks about two weeks earlier mentioning the administration (State) was talking about finding ways to releasing the Blind Sheik to Egypt. Somebody forgot to tell the terrorists that getting the Ambassador was supposed to include alive. This is what everyone of them expected and why no support sent because it was all to plan.
Whoops!
They couldn’t get to him in the safe room, so they tried to smoke him out by using diesel fuel to accelerate the furniture burning. By now they were pissed with the infusion of adrenaline and lost focus of the mission. But in the following link, what came first, the chicken or the egg. This was all to coverup the DOS gunrunning in direct violation of the Iran-Contra laws.
So, to go to your point, we now know that Hitlery did talk by phone to Barry at about 22:00 hours DC time and then at about 20:30 the first inkling of the video story began to surface in regards to Benghazi as the Cairo excuse was already out there.
http://christianchat.com/christian-news-forum/55632-ambassador-stevens.html
Nobody outside of the Marines were at the Cairo Embassy that day. The prepared apology for the video went out from State before the Cairo demonstration started. What is also needed is a better investigation of what went on in Yemen.
It's an attempt to explain WHY the terrorist choose the to plan or carry out an attack when they do.
The 1st time something almost exactly the same as the “spontaneous” lie was concocted to explain why the terrorist choose the time they do to plan/carry out an attack was in January of 2006.
At that time it was the ACLU with the help of Al Jazera and Osama Bin Laden with the tape he made.
First al Jazera said the tape was made in December then it was changed to January.
In the tape OBL said preparations were being made for another attack.
The idea was to try and make it appear as if OBL had picked up on a news story which appeared at the end of December and bingo, he decided to plan an attack. That was why it was so important to try and make it appear as if the tape was made in January AFTER the news story had appeared in December.
The news story was the ACLU passing out video cameras in St Louise to redo the R King video.
Notice the similarities in the 2 stories.
The reason. The 1st WTC bombing was planned in 1991 with the R King video and the attack was planned to take place with the second trial of the LA police.
In early 2011, the Zippo adm. started targeting the TEA Party with the IRS.
The Zippo WH, dems, and their allies in the MSM began making claims as how the TEA Party was a bunch of racist, KKK, Nazi, ultra violent, Tim McVeigh wanna bees.
On May 1, 2011 there was an attempted car bombing in NYC.
Because it was a fertilizer bomb the dems and their allies in the MSM said their talking points about the TEA Party being ultra violent was accurate.
OOOPS! It was a muslim.
The dems now have a problem. How to explain the attempted bombing matched their talking points to a T.
Here's what I believed happened.
They decided to attempt to recreate the lie they tried to create in 2006 and make it appear as if the terrorist are picking up on news stories then planning their attacks around the news story.
I believe this is the purpose of the terrorist attack that was planned for the plane. It was planned during the dust up created by the MSM with the Travon Martin case.
Exact same pattern. Plan an attack in association with civil unrest.
I believe that was the purpose of having the agent on the plan. Create the lie the terrorist are picking up on news and planning their attack around the news.
The AP screwed up Zippo’s lie.
Enter Benghazi and the “spontaneous” lie.
The spontaneous lie is no more complicated than “the terrorist are so in tune with the news they can pick up on a news story plan and carry out a terrorist attack in a matter of a few minutes, it's spontaneous”.
Because the spontaneous lie is so ridiculous I don't believe they intended for anyone to believe it.
Had the attack gone as planned and the terrorist had taken everyone hostage it would have been a perfect setup to make it appear as if Mitt Romney and the repubs had collaborated with the terrorist to make Zippo look like Peanuts Carter.
I believe the main objective of the attack was to make it appear as if it's the repubs collaborating with the terrorist and set Hillary up for 2016.