[DSH]

I doubt that the two judges really care. They kept their names off the subpoenas and don’t really care if Eric The Corrupt found someone dumber to put their name on it. They’ll joke about it and rag him at the gentlemen s club.

That's not true. The first of the U.S. magistrate judges, Alan Kay, did sign the warrant -- it was a "search and seizure warrant," by the way, not a "subpoena," as the story inaccurately states -- on May 28, 2010.

The second magistrate judge who was involved had no occasion to sign the warrant as his only role, apparently, was to issue a ruling on DOJ's "motion for clarification" of one aspect of Judge Kay's original order. As it happens, this second magistrate did so without realizing that Judge Kay had himself already ruled on the motion.

What actually happened here, and what is being "reported" as to what happened here, bear no reasonable resemblance to each other, I'm afraid. A lot of ill-informed allegations are being thrown out as a consequence, by "reporters" and "pundits" who should know better, but who apparently don't give a damn about being accurate or honest.

[Diogenesis]

So these were not Article III judges?

There is a coup d’etat going on and the Judges
have prevented Americans from seeing the Invader’s
documentation. They are therefore complicit.

[BushCountry]

You know the warrant was a complete fabrication and politically motivated. They lied to all three judges, yet you defend it as normal?