Stanne you say: “Why doesn’t some high placed exec who made Eagle Scout just start another group?” One would have to ask, why couldn’t the queers just start THEIR own group? I would give almost anything to go a month without hearing the word “gay” or anything about any of their stupid agendas.
My kingdom for a horse.
I, too, would give almost anything to not have to hear it.
Woke up from a nap thinking (since November, I wake up every morning thinking; it is a national nightmare) that the same thing has a\happened all over. In corporations, the military, etc, they all have to be sensitive to the gay agenda or the gays will take over the establishment, but, lo, not being satisfied, they take over anyway, and that in the case of the BSA and military, they must use legal and govo-political means, respectively.
I don’t wonder why they don’t just start their own. They don’t want a group, they want others to not have a group by ruining it.
And they have money and smarts and time to win the legal arguments.
Others, people of good will, are not ready nor interested in the spiritual battle that’s going on. they’re not interested in fighting tough, not wanting to face it, too busy leading nice and decent lives, and the more successful they are, the less time they have for this crap.
My thoughts go to suggesting something, anything. and that is never a good position, it suggests that I do something, and I had better figure out why I just don’t.
I have never been involved in BSA. Sociologically, I am the furthest away from it.
I do, however, recognize it as having been an institution vital to formation of boy to men. And I’d like to see some body fight this takeover by doing something to preserve the name of Eagle Scout. I started hearing, last year, screeches of oh, he’s gay, in response to the name “Boy Scout” and that’s where the future belongs.
Our legal system has allowed for this. there might be something that can be done, as people start facing it. Maybe not.