Two questions: Does this only adress members? At what age does a boy “know” he’s gay?
Bigger question - does this in any way address scoutmaters? That is the real problem. Where does this stand?
>> does this in any way address scoutmasters?... Where does this stand?
It’s only a matter of time before five out of ten scoutmasters will be sodomites. The faggot filth are relentless. And far too many in our society have been either seduced into going along or browbeaten into shutting up.
And they should have to explain what “Gay” means in terms of their sexual preferences.....specifically so other scouts will know what defines gays.....the way they define themselves.
Also where does the previously deep medical concerns about exposure to “gay” HIV/AIDS through exposure to bodily fluids fit? That’s why law enforcement and medical professionals are overly cautious to protect themselves. Why not protect scouts as well?
The Law Suit to require homosexual men, particularly those that where recently homosexual Boy Scouts, to be allowed positions in both the volunteer and professional ranks of Scouting. Now that hey have admitted Gay boys they will be required to allow those boys to continue on in the organization after they matriculate to adult buggery.
In July 2012 last year, after an eleven member BSA committee studied the membership policy for two years they concluded that the prohibition on open and avowed homosexuality was “the absolute best policy” for the BSA according to the Associated Press. Then the Homo lobby put bid pressure on corporate sponsors and board members. That turned it. They where hell bent to not lose corporate money.
What they don’t understand is once the pressure is off, the corporations will NOT make up the loss of private funding AND the massive loss of members and volunteers will be irreversible. The Homo Lobby is generally not exactly a large or very generous organization either in money or spirit. They BSA are doomed to be significantly smaller and less important organization. They may possibly go under.
Boy Scouts where already ‘uncool’ to most boys. They are now going to be ‘uncool faggots’.
Bigger question - does this in any way address scoutmaters? That is the real problem. Where does this stand?