Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

IRS Source: Lerner Placed On Administrative Leave
National Review ^ | 5/23/13 | Eliana Johnson

Posted on 05/23/2013 2:06:19 PM PDT by Nachum

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 101-120121-140141-160161 next last
To: Jet Jaguar
Section 1203 of the Internal Revenue Code specifies that any IRS employee who invokes the 5th Amendment in a judicial or administrative proceeding relevant to their job is subject to immediate termination, without recourse.

Here ya go.

141 posted on 05/23/2013 5:53:32 PM PDT by mware
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 138 | View Replies]

To: Texas Songwriter

“I came across another little piece of information regarding the IRSgate. They were not only giving hell to those 501C4 applications, but they were REVIEWING all adoption applications for tax relief “
~~~~~~~~~~~

Hmmm...Haven’t seen that reported. Do you have a link?


142 posted on 05/23/2013 5:53:50 PM PDT by thouworm (Steyn: They let [Stevens] die, and then told lies over his coffin.They did that to one of their own.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 124 | View Replies]

To: TADSLOS
...If she can stay alive.

Wouldn't surprise me if she committed suicide. Fine with me, she can then meet the devil. She deserves it.

143 posted on 05/23/2013 5:54:01 PM PDT by unixfox (Abolish Slavery, Repeal The 16th Amendment!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 111 | View Replies]

To: Huskrrrr


Monster 4 Wheeler.
144 posted on 05/24/2013 1:04:39 AM PDT by American Constitutionalist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: maine yankee
So how will the MSM and the liberals respond when many start finking and rating out on him ?
At least the popcorn futures will be doing good because this will be the best entertainment we have seen in many years.
145 posted on 05/24/2013 1:08:51 AM PDT by American Constitutionalist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: Sooth2222
Plea deal to be a testimony wittiness perhaps ?
146 posted on 05/24/2013 1:10:36 AM PDT by American Constitutionalist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: okie01
Section 1203 of the Internal Revenue Code specifies that any IRS employee who invokes the 5th Amendment in a judicial or administrative proceeding relevant to their job is subject to immediate termination, without recourse.

Ms. Lerner should already be on the street.

First I agree with you 100%

That being said the loophole I see here is that congress is neither the judiciary or the "administrators" of the IRS. They can find her in contempt of Congress and the consequences are similar, but separation of powers means they have to go to court for various things.

147 posted on 05/24/2013 2:29:20 AM PDT by verga (A nation divided by Zero!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 135 | View Replies]

To: mware

Someone on one of the FOX shows last night (Greta, perhaps) said that the laws pertaining to Civil Service employees require a 30 day period of administrative leave with pay, for “review”, I suppose, before an employee can be terminated. Then I would guess that there are probably appeals after that.

Newt (on Greta) was talking about how some of these laws go back to the 1800’s, and how badly the system is in dire need of total overhaul, as opposed to just going after certain individuals (or by implication) any given administration. He does have a point there, and I would extend it:

The TEA Party is a threat to the GOP-e, and I am not so sure the same sort of thing might not go on under a GOP administration, directed at the TEA Party. Some of these people are career vampires, regardless of who appointed them. Mr. Shulman, for example, seems to have at a minimum been “looking the other way”...


148 posted on 05/24/2013 2:43:36 AM PDT by Paul R. (We are in a break in an Ice Age. A brief break at that...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 141 | View Replies]

To: matginzac

Admin leave means “with pay”.


149 posted on 05/24/2013 3:56:29 AM PDT by trebb (Where in the the hell has my country gone?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: stephenjohnbanker; maggief; penelopesire; onyx

With time to think more questions:
She refused to resign...
Was the union paying her lawyers?
It’s one of the reasons teachers join : they get paid legal counseling if a situation arises while performing duties and employed If she resigns no legal support? She gets who they send her which just happens to be the same law firm as..... A law firm cannot represent two sides of an issue but they can represent two facets on one side of the case.
Thoughts?


150 posted on 05/24/2013 4:04:54 AM PDT by hoosiermama (Obama: "Born in Kenya" Lying now or then.u)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: thouworm
These people all have jobs at levels and under conditions where current federal law prohibits union representation.

So how is it the union has anything to do with them?

151 posted on 05/24/2013 5:08:14 AM PDT by muawiyah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 68 | View Replies]

To: Paul R.
Couple of things going on here ~

(1) IRS simply can't operate if you have jack booted federal thugs ~ Lois Lerner certainly qualifies ~ pleading the 5th about ACTIONS TAKEN AS AN OFFICER OF THE GOVERNMENT. She is the very sort of individual the Bill of Rights was written to protect all the rest of us from!

(2) The Congress has an advantage if she continues to hold a government position in that they can take action against her as an OFFICER OF THE GOVERNMENT and strip her of her earned benefits ~ if they can figure out the right charge to make. And we all want Lois stripped bare and nekkid (in court), right?

Now, about union relationships with Lois, she has a job that prohibits union representation. I'd think that extends to her legal bills, although her hubby will probably get a good rate from some of his buddies ~ he's a tax lawyer you know.

I'm preparing to plead the 5th on my next federal income tax filing BTW ~ see how far that gets me eh!!

152 posted on 05/24/2013 5:18:13 AM PDT by muawiyah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 148 | View Replies]

To: thouworm; The Cajun

The report regarding the reviewing of adopted children was seen of FOX news, “The Five”, and brought up by Dana Perino, on Thursday, May 24, 2013.


153 posted on 05/24/2013 6:23:41 AM PDT by Texas Songwriter (')
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 142 | View Replies]

To: Texas Songwriter

We will probably never know just how many people have been blackmailed nor how often.

Threaten Roberts? Somebody probably did.


154 posted on 05/24/2013 7:27:14 AM PDT by Sequoyah101
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 124 | View Replies]

To: DanMiller

One has to have or value character and reputation to be disgraced. This is all a game to people like Lerner. She will never miss a beat.


155 posted on 05/24/2013 7:28:13 AM PDT by Sequoyah101
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 126 | View Replies]

To: muawiyah

My post was a response to post 35-—”I didn’t know until the other day, that they [IRS] even had a union.”

That poster had read this article:

http://spectator.org/archives/2013/05/20/obama-and-the-irs-the-smoking


156 posted on 05/24/2013 8:04:43 AM PDT by thouworm (Steyn: They let [Stevens] die, and then told lies over his coffin.They did that to one of their own.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 151 | View Replies]

To: thouworm
We've discussed that article several times. Employees in IRS in 'Confidential' positions are not allowed to be represented by a union ~ and that's been in the law since probably the Roosevelts.

When it comes to membership you'll find people at those higher levels joining for the purpose of signing onto a members only health insurance program ~ e.g. several postal groups are like that, or maybe long term care, which NTEU offers.

Such members still do not qualify to be represented.

I noticed someone else had claimed the IG's report had a union rep present in all interviews. Wonder if that was the case when it came to the grade levels involved in the scandal ~ or if that was just if a bargaining unit person was being questioned. I know at my level if a union rep wanted to be present I'd had USPS and the union in court ~ they'd never get to talk to me unless I wanted to, and I did much more than my fair share of whitleblowing over the years. Show me to the federal witness protection program please!!!!!!

I think the folks at American Spectator owe it to the rest of us to AKS the right questions eh. They didn't. Most likely they've never had anyone on their editorial board who worked in a federal agency at the headquarters unit. Well, maybe Charles Guy, but he was always wrong ~ as I've demonstrated numerous time.

157 posted on 05/24/2013 9:04:54 AM PDT by muawiyah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 156 | View Replies]

To: Paul R.
The Pendleton Act probably still has some active parts ~ but IRS has its own sections written many years later. One of them is going to be a requirement that you stay on the rolls until we are done questioning you....... ~ after all you be the TAX MAN pouncing on the public left and right ~ THE TAX MAN ~ all up and down with all the might.

Let me interpret that ~ you can't just walk away from some of these federal agencies. They have to let you leave first ~ and they can make you talk with no 5th amendment protection whatsoever about what you did on the job. These folks were, at the bottom end, the rough equivalent of Captains and Majors. Some of the middle men were the equivalent of Colonels, and there's even a couple of Generals in the dock. Thse are not janitorial staff.

158 posted on 05/24/2013 9:10:09 AM PDT by muawiyah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 148 | View Replies]

To: muawiyah

“I noticed someone else had claimed the IG’s report had a union rep present in all interviews.”

Someone? Did you see that in an article? Incorrect as far as I know. The someone you are referring to may have been referring to Holly Paz, Director of Exempt Organizations.

Holly Paz - Director of Exempt Organizations (sat in on 36 of 41 IG interviews of subordinates). She was interviewed by Issa committee staff on Tues of this week but has not yet testified before Issa’s committee.


159 posted on 05/24/2013 9:23:06 AM PDT by thouworm (Steyn: They let [Stevens] die, and then told lies over his coffin.They did that to one of their own.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 157 | View Replies]

To: hoosiermama; maggief; penelopesire; onyx

” A law firm cannot represent two sides of an issue but they can represent two facets on one side of the case.”

Yes. I have had first hand experience with this in civil court.


160 posted on 05/24/2013 9:28:04 AM PDT by stephenjohnbanker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 150 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 101-120121-140141-160161 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson