Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

DHS SENDS IN CHOPPER to Intimidate Tea Party Protesters in LA
Gateway Pundit ^ | May 22, 2013 | Jim Hoft

Posted on 05/22/2013 5:18:20 AM PDT by 2ndDivisionVet

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100101-120121-140 ... 161-177 next last
To: MissMagnolia

The way things are going, the DHS is going to be Obama’s not-so-secret version of the Gestapo ....

DH-Stapo....


101 posted on 05/22/2013 8:17:55 AM PDT by GraceG
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Westbrook

According to the DHS, OWS are not terrotists, the TEA Party members are. And in spite of what the judas goats say to the contrary, they are itching to use some, if not all that ammo they purchased on us.


102 posted on 05/22/2013 8:18:33 AM PDT by sport
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: Jane Long

The original Tea Party people dressed up as Injuns, what should we dress up when we end up having to do mischeif...


103 posted on 05/22/2013 8:23:13 AM PDT by GraceG
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 72 | View Replies]

To: GraceG

Injuns is good just too watch the PC police go completely nuts.


104 posted on 05/22/2013 8:27:00 AM PDT by inpajamas (http://outskirtspress.com/ONE)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 103 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

Listening to Glenn Beck on the Blaze radio this morning, he said something and I was not sure if it is true. I hope some knowledgeable freeper can answer this.

Glenn said something to the effect that if you are questioned by DHS, that you CANNOT tell anyone or call an attorney, if you do, both you and your attorney can be put in jail. Something about a provision in the Patriot Act.

Is this true or did I misunderstand what he said, or is he (Glenn Beck) mistaken in his facts???

That is horrible if true! I knew the Patriot Act had terrible stuff in it, but wow. We are under the thumb of the Stasi already if that is true.

They were also talking about how there are now many DHS vehicles around the country that are now being labeled “POLICE” in large letters, with “DHS” in small letters below. Identifying themselves as a Federal police force.


105 posted on 05/22/2013 8:28:49 AM PDT by boxlunch
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LaRueLaDue

“legal”... what does that mean?
Deriving just powers from the Constitution?
or
Able to enforce their will through the application or threat of deadly force?


106 posted on 05/22/2013 8:29:10 AM PDT by MrB (The difference between a Humanist and a Satanist - the latter admits whom he's working for)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 88 | View Replies]

To: Nachum

For the list


107 posted on 05/22/2013 8:34:30 AM PDT by Army Air Corps (Four Fried Chickens and a Coke)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CPONuke

DHS has prescribed in their training manuals to be cautious about potential domestic terrorists. That includes anyone in the TEA party, and particularly, anyone critical of the federal government. DHS is on guard.


108 posted on 05/22/2013 8:36:18 AM PDT by patriotsoul
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: Flick Lives

“He has erected a multitude of New Offices, and sent hither swarms of Officers to harrass our people, and eat out their substance.”

Hmmm.


109 posted on 05/22/2013 8:40:16 AM PDT by FreedomPoster (Islam delenda est)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Flick Lives

LOL


110 posted on 05/22/2013 8:42:27 AM PDT by TigersEye ("No man left behind" is more than an Army Ranger credo it's the character of America.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: tillacum
I thought homeland insecurity was put together to protect the borders of this country against illegal intruders. Guess I was wrong.

Partially correct. It was put together to protect this country against illegal intruders. Yesterday afternoon, the Tea Party protesters were the "illegal intruders"...

111 posted on 05/22/2013 8:43:10 AM PDT by COBOL2Java (Fighting Obama without Boehner & McConnell is like going deer hunting without your accordion)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 67 | View Replies]

To: unixfox

I was thinking the same thing...It’s time we start pushing back.


112 posted on 05/22/2013 8:46:23 AM PDT by Heavyrunner (Socialize this.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: MrB

“Let’s make sure it’s not done in a hot-headed way,
but in a cold, calculated way,
ie, on our terms, not theirs.”

Very sound advice. Bears repeating.


113 posted on 05/22/2013 8:49:40 AM PDT by MichaelCorleone (Keep your eyes on Jesus. He is the same yesterday, today, and forever.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

Well, that didn’t take long. I may have to shorten my estimate as to just how quickly this thing is going to get bloody. On an unrelated note, I see a little .308 ammo is starting to hit the shelves again.


114 posted on 05/22/2013 8:51:09 AM PDT by Billthedrill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: butterdezillion; onyx; penelopesire

I found this link in one of the comments below the article. My apologies if this has already been posted - the rule was enacted about 10 days ago. But it seems to be pertinent to this thread. I just posted a little bit of it and dont have time to read the rest. Seems to be giving the President the power to put the Armed Forces to work on American soil to “support” local authorities.


I just found this post on another blog last night regarding putting local law enforcement under federal control:
VIGILANCE!!!
While we are focused on the scandals, LOOK WHAT THE OTHER HAND IS DOING!!!!

http://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/FR-2013-04-12/html/2013-07802.htm

[Federal Register Volume 78, Number 71 (Friday, April 12, 2013)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 21826-21839]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2013-07802]



DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

Office of the Secretary

[DOD-2009-OS-0038; RIN 0790-AI54]

32 CFR Part 182

Defense Support of Civilian Law Enforcement Agencies

AGENCY: Department of Defense.

ACTION: Final rule.


SUMMARY: This rule implements DoD regulations and legislation
concerning restriction on direct participation by DoD personnel. It
provides specific policy direction and assigns responsibilities with
respect to DoD support provided to Federal, State, and local civilian
law enforcement agencies, including responses to civil disturbances.

DATES: This rule is effective May 13, 2013.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr. Tom LaCrosse, 571-256-8353.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

[[Page 21827]]

Executive Summary

I. Purpose of the Regulatory Action

a. The purpose of this rule is to implement the statutory
requirements for the Department of Defense support of civilian law
enforcement agencies. This rule provides specific policy direction and
assigns responsibilities to Department of Defense key individuals
providing support to Federal, State, Tribal, and local law enforcement
agencies, including response to civil disturbances within the United
States, including the District of Columbia, the Commonwealth of Puerto
Rico, the U.S. Virgin Islands, Guam, American Samoa, the Commonwealth
of the Northern Mariana Islands, and any territory or possession of the
United States or any other political subdivision thereof.
b. The legal authority for this rule is 10 U.S.C. 375,
``Restriction on participation by Military Personnel.’’

II. Summary of the Major Provisions of the Rule

a. Support in Accordance With the Posse Comitatus Act
The primary restriction on DoD participation in civilian law
enforcement activities is the Posse Comitatus Act. It provides that
whoever willfully uses any part of the Army or the Air Force as a posse
comitatus or otherwise to execute U.S. laws, except in cases and under
circumstances expressly authorized by the Constitution or Act of
Congress, shall be fined under title 18, U.S.C., or imprisoned not more
than two years, or both. Section 182.6 (a) describes in detail the
assistance that the Department of Defense may and may not provide
civilian law enforcement agencies.
b. Support During Civil Disturbances
The President is authorized by the Constitution and laws of the
United States to employ the Armed Forces of the United States to
suppress insurrections, rebellions, and domestic violence under various
conditions and circumstances. Planning and preparedness by the Federal
Government, including the Department of Defense, for civil disturbances
is important due to the potential severity of the consequences of such
events for the Nation and the population. The employment of Federal
military forces to control civil disturbances shall only occur in a
specified civil jurisdiction under specific circumstances as authorized
by the President, normally through issuance of an Executive order or
other Presidential directive authorizing and directing the Secretary of
Defense to provide for the restoration of law and order in a specific
State or locality.


115 posted on 05/22/2013 9:08:48 AM PDT by boxlunch
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 99 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

116 posted on 05/22/2013 9:17:48 AM PDT by Grampa Dave ('How empty and dead' were they to let Chris Stevens, one of them , die for 'Obama-Clinton fiction?')
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jet Jaguar; NorwegianViking; ExTexasRedhead; HollyB; FromLori; EricTheRed_VocalMinority; ...

The list, Ping

Let me know if you would like to be on or off the ping list

http://www.nachumlist.com/


117 posted on 05/22/2013 9:19:27 AM PDT by Nachum (The Obama "List" at www.nachumlist.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jsanders2001

There’s a reason DHS is buying enough ammunition to fight a war on American soil for 20 years.


118 posted on 05/22/2013 9:22:49 AM PDT by Thane_Banquo ( Walker 2016)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: unixfox
Sounds like they were begging for trouble.

Ya know, one day they just may get what they are asking for.


All I can say is smile and wave back at them, I'm sure it would drive them crazy.
119 posted on 05/22/2013 9:23:14 AM PDT by Nowhere Man (Holodeck Computer! End Obongo Administration Simulation Program NOW!!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: McGruff

Heil Barackula!!!! B-P Why do I keep thinking of “Blacula” from the movie of the same name when I say that? B-P


120 posted on 05/22/2013 9:26:39 AM PDT by Nowhere Man (Holodeck Computer! End Obongo Administration Simulation Program NOW!!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100101-120121-140 ... 161-177 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson