Kevmo: Wouldn’t it be interesting to propose and enforce a law that requires that ~50% of contributions from IRS personnel be to each party evenly? A “proactive reverse discrimination” such as the Bakke case in California.
COAC: Interesting, but blatantly unconstitutional.... What do you mean, “why isn’t it unconstitutional the other?”
***You claim that my proposal is unconstitutional. And yet, currently the IRS operates openly in antagonism to conservative groups, in an unconstitutional fashion. Why isn’t that unconstitutional?
It is. But, a law requiring people to make political contributions in a certain proportion would be unconstitutional as well.