Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: lentulusgracchus
20 No it isn't, and the Supreme Court agreed in the James Dale case in 2000.

That vote was 5-4 for BSA. The BSA legal advisers told the National Executive Committee that it thought if such a case was brought before the SCOTUS today, BSA would lose.

This is a typical homosexual cabal at work, undermining from the inside and from nearby contacts in business and the community that the Scouts rely on for help. The campaign continues.

Agreed. Everyone should keep their heads. There will be fall-out whichever way the vote goes next week.

34 posted on 05/18/2013 11:00:03 PM PDT by MacNaughton
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies ]


To: MacNaughton
The BSA legal advisers told the National Executive Committee that it thought if such a case was brought before the SCOTUS today, BSA would lose.

Yeah, sad reminder -- they had nooooo trouble at all swallowing the recent and extremely relevant precedent of Bowers vs. Hardwick, on which the ink was barely dry, when they spun out new law de novo and ex nihilo in the Lawrence case, which has the stink of cabal all over it. Oh, really? -- a GOP-appointed AJ wrote the "opinion" (<sarc> intentional)? How ..... collegial and bipartisan of him! Traitorous scum!

And yeah, we might have real trouble with that Diesel scum Kagan on the court, and the Administration homering for every species of paraphilic perv that God ever made.

47 posted on 05/22/2013 10:17:51 AM PDT by lentulusgracchus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson