Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Feds Want To Lower Legal Blood Alcohol Limit for Drivers
Reason ^ | May 14, 2013 | Reason.com

Posted on 05/17/2013 8:46:37 AM PDT by Altariel

Federal accident investigators recommended Tuesday that states cut their threshold for drunken driving by nearly half, matching a standard that has substantially reduced highway deaths in other countries.

The National Transportation Safety Board said states should shrink the standard from the current .08 blood alcohol content to .05 as part of a series of recommendations aimed at reducing alcohol-related highway deaths.

More than 100 countries have adopted the .05 alcohol content standard or lower, according to a report by the board's staff. In Europe, the share of traffic deaths attributable to drunken driving was reduced by more than half within 10 years after the standard was dropped.

(Excerpt) Read more at reason.com ...


TOPICS: Miscellaneous
KEYWORDS: alcohol; bac; donutwatch; drunkdriving; revenue
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-40 next last

1 posted on 05/17/2013 8:46:37 AM PDT by Altariel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Altariel

Why not just re-instate the 18th amendment. They can abolish the 2nd amendment at the same time. Besides which booze ain’t allowed under sharia anyway. Might as well get started.


2 posted on 05/17/2013 8:49:31 AM PDT by rktman (BACKGROUND CHECKS? YOU FIRST mr. president(not that we'd get the truth!))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Altariel

When is D.A.M.M. going to weigh in on this? Drunks Against Mad Mothers.


3 posted on 05/17/2013 8:50:45 AM PDT by rktman (BACKGROUND CHECKS? YOU FIRST mr. president(not that we'd get the truth!))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Altariel
Why not lower the Legal Blood Alcohol Limit for politicians?

4 posted on 05/17/2013 8:54:29 AM PDT by BitWielder1 (Corporate Profits are better than Government Waste)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rktman

You can’t control honest men and women, so pass enough laws to make everyone a felon. Dui=Cottage industry, Judges, lawyers, fines, probation officers, community service managers... democrats dream.


5 posted on 05/17/2013 8:55:02 AM PDT by usual suspect
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Altariel
Most of the drunks involved in fatal accidents are way over the limit, but Liberals feel compelled to punish the innocent and reward the guilty.

They just can't help themselves.

6 posted on 05/17/2013 8:55:50 AM PDT by E. Pluribus Unum (Islam is a religion of peace, and Moslems reserve the right to detonate anyone who says otherwise.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rktman

0.05 is basically two drinks in an hour. Body mass makes it vary.


7 posted on 05/17/2013 8:55:53 AM PDT by TheRhinelander
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: usual suspect

Not to mention SWAT teams, police chiefs, deputies and sheriffs who will be eager to use this to collect revenue.


8 posted on 05/17/2013 8:56:46 AM PDT by Altariel ("Curse your sudden but inevitable betrayal!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Altariel

Anyone familiar with the science of blood alcohol levels will realize that this is tantamount to Prohibition.


9 posted on 05/17/2013 8:56:50 AM PDT by Salvey
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Travis McGee

ping

A prohibitionist state is a safe state.


10 posted on 05/17/2013 8:59:00 AM PDT by Altariel ("Curse your sudden but inevitable betrayal!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Altariel

If they use the lower level to ring up anyone who gets in a collision or if someone is driving recklessly, that’s one thing. But you know darn well the bastiges will abuse it.

Any thing at all that you get stopped for they can bust you for DUI if you have walked passed a beer at any point in the previous week.


11 posted on 05/17/2013 9:02:24 AM PDT by getitright (If you call this HOPE, can we give despair a shot?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Altariel

Hey NTSB! Would it be easier for you if we all just stayed home?


12 posted on 05/17/2013 9:02:33 AM PDT by PfromHoGro (Free citizens voted to become subjects of the state, how about that!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Altariel
I've got a great idea. Let's lower it to zero. That way anyone can be arrested for DUI at any time thus making several groups happy:
13 posted on 05/17/2013 9:08:41 AM PDT by from occupied ga (Your government is your most dangerous enemy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: All

Expect to see a lot more of this:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=S4Q5FlR6yyA

Instead of writing him down for .016; he claimed he had a BAC of .16

After all, that “little extra zero doesn’t mean ****.” And the “Peasant” should , “You know what…**** it…argue it in court.”


14 posted on 05/17/2013 9:09:57 AM PDT by Altariel ("Curse your sudden but inevitable betrayal!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: BitWielder1

I would rather that they raise the minimum IQ for pols.


15 posted on 05/17/2013 9:13:38 AM PDT by Blood of Tyrants (Inside every liberal and WOD defender is a totalitarian screaming to get out.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Blood of Tyrants

.08 seems kinda high expectations for Congresscritters.


16 posted on 05/17/2013 9:39:44 AM PDT by TurboZamboni (Marx smelled bad & lived with his parents most his life.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: TurboZamboni

.05 would eliminate all socialist democrats from driving. They were born with .05.


17 posted on 05/17/2013 9:41:27 AM PDT by spawn44 (moo)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Altariel

This is all about opening yet another avenue to bring cash to state and local governments. Once they ventured below 0.10 BAC, they started venturing into territory where the cost of the punishment far exceeded the risk presented by the “crime”.

This is just backdoor prohibition. The federal government should have NO SAY over this issue in the first place.


18 posted on 05/17/2013 9:44:53 AM PDT by meyer (When people fear the government, you have Tyranny)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Salvey

Ummm, no. Just no. Drink all you like just don’t drive after drinking. Not hard...


19 posted on 05/17/2013 9:45:27 AM PDT by JCBreckenridge (Texas is a state of mind - Steinbeck)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: meyer

Sigh. This is a terrible argument. Drink all you like, just don’t drive after drinking.


20 posted on 05/17/2013 9:46:12 AM PDT by JCBreckenridge (Texas is a state of mind - Steinbeck)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-40 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson