Skip to comments.
Why is Speaker Boehner Resisting a Special Committee on Benghazi?
American Thinker ^
| 05/15/2013
| J. Robert Smith
Posted on 05/15/2013 7:43:59 AM PDT by SeekAndFind
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-66 next last
To: SeekAndFind
Give him a break. He’s lost his box of tissues.
41
posted on
05/15/2013 8:19:29 AM PDT
by
bgill
(The problem is...no one is watching the Watch List!)
To: Yosemitest
42
posted on
05/15/2013 8:20:34 AM PDT
by
Graewoulf
(Traitor John Roberts' Commune-Style Obama'care' violates U.S. Constitution AND Anti-Trust Law.)
To: House Atreides
We are involved in Syria; gun-running to rebels.
http://www.theblaze.com/stories/2013/01/24/what-exactly-does-boehner-know-about-the-u-s-gun-running-allegations-in-libya-these-comments-raise-questions/
What, Exactly, Does Boehner Know About the U.S. Gun-Running Allegations in Libya? These Comments Raise Questions
Jan. 24, 2013
(snip)
Speaking with conservative author and pundit Laura Ingraham on her radio broadcast Wednesday, Boehner noted that he is aware that there was a potential gun-running scheme at play and that his information on the matter has come from a classified source.
Im somewhat familiar with the chatter about this and the fact that these arms were moving towards Turkey, but most what I know about this came from a classified source, Boehner told Ingraham before adding that he could not elaborate on it.
Does Boehner mean that the theory is being discussed behind closed, classified doors, or does the government have classified information corroborating the scheme that it is not sharing? Do Republicans know more than theyre letting on? Who is the classified source and is the government investigating this theory to the fullest extent possible? Questions abound.
43
posted on
05/15/2013 8:22:11 AM PDT
by
maggief
Comment #44 Removed by Moderator
To: cripplecreek
Never. It’s Kabuki theater.
45
posted on
05/15/2013 8:24:46 AM PDT
by
CatherineofAragon
((Support Christian white males----the architects of the jewel known as Western Civilization).)
To: bgill
Cry me a river Speaker Bonehead!
To: Graewoulf
Ah, so posting a thread to attack republicnats on what the democrips did wasn’t enough? Now you drag that meme to other threads? ... Work to defeat the republicants in 2014 much?
47
posted on
05/15/2013 8:26:25 AM PDT
by
MHGinTN
(Being deceived can be cured.)
To: Graewoulf
I can only guess.but I'd guess he did.
I think we should bury his phone lines and email with complaints.
Here are the ones that have earned my contempt.
The GOP is full of
VILE members who'll sell us out in a heartbeat!
Here are the ones that I know about.
What do we do when our side is full of TRAITORS?
I submit the following for proof.
Check out this link,
"Senate Republicans Willfully and Knowingly Lie to Their Constituents (vote to fund Obamacare)".
The following Senators voted to pass the continuing resolution even though it still funds Obamacare. If any one of those senators tells you they did not vote to fund Obamacare or, in fact, voted against funding Obamacare,they are being mendacious.
They may have voted for Ted Cruzs amendment,
but after it failed,they still knowingly and willingly voted to fund Obamacare.
And now they are lying to their constituents who call them out on it.
Many of these same Senators are also supporting separate legislation to foist a massive tax increase on the American people.
And let's not forget Sen. John McCain, one of Conservatives worst enemies, saying
'I don't understand' GOP filibuster on guns.
Thanks to Cyropaedia for this:
And the Gang of 8 will try to tell you that this is just one more reason we need to pass amnesty, -NOW.
48
posted on
05/15/2013 8:28:59 AM PDT
by
Yosemitest
(It's Simple ! Fight, ... or Die !)
Comment #49 Removed by Moderator
To: SeekAndFind
Boehner is only interested in making deals. Every deal gives him a chip to cash in at the next deal. Let’s look at recent history.
First there was the debt deal and the “super committee”. Of course this could take action before the election, that would be “politicizing” things.
Having setup the next deal we come to the “fiscal cliff”. Another capitulation, BUT there is now another deal off in the future: Sequestration.
This is how Boehner operates. Endless capitulations to keep the game going. Trading chips. Making deals.
He is a vile leach.
Failing to thoroughly investigate Benghazi, not just the cover-up, marks him as a disloyal American.
50
posted on
05/15/2013 8:59:28 AM PDT
by
Ray76
(Do you reject Obama? And all his works? And all his empty promises?)
The IRS crime is serious. If Obama is connected he will be impeached. But I’m sure he either kept it at a remove or it will be made to look that way. In the end he will not be impeached over the IRS.
Benghazi on the other hand is all his.
But just like Clinton was not impeached for Loral, Obama will not be impeached for Benghazi. Why? Because the Republicans will not pursue it. They will focus on IRS. They will be exactly off target, just like with Clinton - go after Lewinsky rather than Loral. Now they will go after IRS and not Benghazi, or if they do it will be the coverup.
The Benghazi operation will be protected. UNLESS - we raise alot of noise.
51
posted on
05/15/2013 9:13:40 AM PDT
by
Ray76
(Do you reject Obama? And all his works? And all his empty promises?)
To: 3Fingas
Because he has been in Washington too
long and he betrayed us for 30 pieces of silver.it's not the silver coins, it's perks of office...
golf trips / balls,smokes & Booze..
He's a E$tabli$hment Republican
52
posted on
05/15/2013 9:15:38 AM PDT
by
skinkinthegrass
(who'll take tomorrow,$pend it all today;who can take your income & tax it all away..0'Blowfly can :-)
To: SeekAndFind
The ‘Rats did the dirty work for the Gelding Old Party. The GOP is high fiving behind closed doors. There is one party on the Potomac ... the criminal party.
53
posted on
05/15/2013 9:25:19 AM PDT
by
VRWC For Truth
(Roberts has perverted the Constitution)
To: SeekAndFind
The most obvious explanation is that Boehner is another big government plant in the republican party that somehow has enough talent to rise to a leadership position but then immediately has no talent to defend the country against the crafty democrats undermining the Constitution and the nation.
He's scum.
54
posted on
05/15/2013 9:30:51 AM PDT
by
Amagi
(Obama is never so animated as when he is assaulting the Constitution.)
To: SeekAndFind
Issa is doing such a good job on his own that the appointment of a special committee runs the risk of interfering with Issa’s investigation by adding even more blow-hards to the process from both parties who are more interested in hearing themselves speak than in conducting a serious investigation.
I’m sure this is not Boner’s excuse, but it is a legitimate reason to retain the status quo.
To: VRWC For Truth
There is one party on the Potomac Agreed. The Democrat-Republican Party. The ruling DRP has run unopposed for a long long time. That needs to change. And soon, if we are to survive.
56
posted on
05/15/2013 9:42:20 AM PDT
by
Ray76
(Do you reject Obama? And all his works? And all his empty promises?)
To: SeekAndFind
Given the man’s history here it is not terribly clear just what his game is or whose side he is on.
57
posted on
05/15/2013 9:48:35 AM PDT
by
arthurus
(Read Hazlitt's Economics In One Lesson ONLINE www.fee.org/library/books/economics-in-one-lesson)
To: Labyrinthos
Issa is doing great at the moment.
If key people don't voluntarily come forward to testify, then subpeonas will become necessary and a select committee should be created.
Also, don't do the select committee too soon...let's string this thing out.
To: SeekAndFind
I'm sure I am in the extreme minority here, but I don't want a Select Committee either. It'll give the Rats an opportunity to drag it out for months just seating the members, and we'll end up with one full of Pickerings. Just give Oversight subpoena power and let them work.
59
posted on
05/15/2013 11:47:15 AM PDT
by
Cyber Liberty
(I am a dissident. Will you join me? My name is John....)
To: cripplecreek
We need a way to take these things out of the hands of congress. A Secial Prosecutor would do. But no Select Committee.
60
posted on
05/15/2013 11:50:28 AM PDT
by
Cyber Liberty
(I am a dissident. Will you join me? My name is John....)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-66 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson