Anybody who knows how the Constitution is supposed to work knows that the 10th Amendment was made to clarify that the Constitution's silence about things like marriage automatically makes marriage a 10th Amendment protected state power issue.
On the other hand, Constitution-ignoring activist justices may wrongly legislate from the bench and give the green light to the pro-homosexual agenda.
I realize this, like the interstate commerce clause, has been interpreted overbroadly, but it still must be given some consideration.
A marriage in Massachusetts must be honored as a marriage in Utah, or not?