[rfp1234]

If CO2, as some studies suggest, is a lagging indicator of warming, then this may simply be a response to last century's natural warming cycle (which according to the Brit Met Office, stopped 16 years ago).

Of course that assumes that the CO2 data are legitimate, statistically valid, and unfudged. That's far from certain.

[Dr. Bogus Pachysandra]

“Of course that assumes that the CO2 data are legitimate, statistically valid, and unfudged.”

Well, of course they are, they were taken on top of a volcano. Perfect spot!

[Still Thinking]

Of course that assumes that the CO2 data are legitimate, statistically valid, and unfudged.

Actually, since they're useful to libs (liars and charlatans), it's pretty much a given that they're NOT any of that stuff.