The metaphor is off. Benghazi ain't Humpty. The Prez is the one in danger of falling off the wall.
Humpty O'Bumpty
More detail.
Gotta get those talking points settled.
So many are ridiculed and hated by the American public
as they side with liars, traitors, and the corrupt.
During the Nixon Administration, the press decried such attempts to control the news.
Now, the reporters go sheepishly to the White House to be spoon fed. Pity there is nothing resembling Investigative Journalism anymore.
We could sure use some right now.
It would be interesting to see which reporters were in the private meeting and what questions they asked in the open presser. It seems very likely that this will backfire -— I can imagine something like this is going to make the angry “outsiders” want to dig deeper.
“Here’s how we want it spun...”
I believe it was to run the Carney Barker through a mock press conference.
If they dig their hole any deeper they will strike oil and you know how they would hate that.
The metaphor is off. Benghazi ain't Humpty. The Prez is the one in danger of falling off the wall.
Humpty O'Bumpty
I love it, they are too stupid to realize this makes them look even worse.
TREASON - continuous, pre-meditated, agenda-driven, in-your-face, MEDIA-COMPLICIT, agency-abetted, representative-enabled, ongoing...
TREASON like this republic has NEVER seen before.
Must be getting hot in the kitchen! The white hut in full reaction mode.
Press meetings under 0bama, private.
Your medical records under 0bamacare, public.
That sounds about right.
Just another Team Meeting.
http://www.examiner.com/article/walter-duranty-stalin-s-mouthpiece
Modern media has lost the public trust in today’s cynical age. In recent years, The New York Times experienced scandal over contrived stories and complaints about their biased coverage. These charges are not new. In 1931, Times reporter Walter Duranty won a Pulitzer Prize for his reporting from Moscow. However, his work proved a fabrication as he denied reports of widespread famine and Soviet oppression. Duranty violated the public trust in an ideological effort to improve communism’s image.
Duranty served as the New York Times Bureau chief in Moscow from 1922-1934. In 1929, Stalin granted Duranty an interview making him a journalistic star. Duranty attempted to explain communism and the Russian psyche to readers. Most of his analysis was simplistic and covered for Stalin’s crimes. Despite this, his work led to a Pulitzer Prize in 1932.
The reporter shared Stalin’s view of the kulaks and attacked them for living “privileged.” He felt Stalin an Old Testament prophet determined to meld the classes together. Duranty claimed people sent to slave labor camps had a choice between the gulag and reintegrating into society. On top of this, he argued collectivization gave the Russian people hope even as he witnessed the famines caused by these programs. Although he did not refute Stalin’s brutality, Duranty defended and supported it. Stalin praised the New York Times reporter for the propaganda.
This is the payoff for feeding the Press Corp all those donuts last week: unquestioning loyalty to the talking points and don’t investigate further.
No mystery here. Obama merely wanted to give them their copies of the official white house photos taken during the recent correspondent’s dinner. A little private time among friends.
Pulitzer-Winning Lies
http://m.weeklystandard.com/Content/Public/Articles/000/000/002/791vwuaz.asp?ZoomFont=YES
Excerpt:
I am downloading here some of the lies contained in those dispatches, lies which the New York Times has never repudiated with the same splash as it accorded Jayson Blair’s comparatively trivial lies:
“There is no famine or actual starvation nor is there likely to be.”
—New York Times, Nov. 15, 1931, page 1
“Any report of a famine in Russia is today an exaggeration or malignant propaganda.”
—New York Times, August 23, 1933
“Enemies and foreign critics can say what they please. Weaklings and despondents at home may groan under the burden, but the youth and strength of the Russian people is essentially at one with the Kremlin’s program, believes it worthwhile and supports it, however hard be the sledding.”
—New York Times, December 9, 1932, page 6
“You can’t make an omelet without breaking eggs.”
—New York Times, May 14, 1933, page 18
“There is no actual starvation or deaths from starvation but there is widespread mortality from diseases due to malnutrition.”
—New York Times, March 31, 1933, page 13
I would like to add another Duranty quote, not in his dispatches, which is reported in a memoir by Zara Witkin, a Los Angeles architect, who lived in the Soviet Union during the 1930s. (”An American Engineer in Stalin’s Russia: The Memoirs of Zara Witkin, 1932-1934,” University of California Press ). The memoirist describes an evening during which the Moscow correspondents were discussing how to get out the story about the Stalin-made Russian famine. To get around the censorship, the UP’s Eugene Lyons was telephoning the dire news of the famine to his New York office but the was ordered to stop because it was antagonizing the Kremlin. Ralph Barnes, the New York Herald Tribune reporter, turned to Duranty and asked him what he was going to write. Duranty replied:
Nothing. What are a few million dead Russians in a situation like this? Quite unimportant. This is just an incident in the sweeping historical changes here. I think the entire matter is exaggerated.
And this was at a time when peasants in Ukraine were dying of starvation at the rate of 25,000 a day.
In his masterwork about Stalin’s imposed famine on Ukraine, “Harvest of Sorrow,” Robert Conquest has written:
As one of the best known correspondents in the world for one of the best known newspapers in the world, Mr. Duranty’s denial that there was a famine was accepted as gospel. Thus Mr. Duranty gulled not only the readers of the New York Times but because of the newspaper’s prestige, he influenced the thinking of countless thousands of other readers about the character of Josef Stalin and the Soviet regime. And he certainly influenced the newly-elected President Roosevelt to recognize the Soviet Union.
What is so awful about Duranty is that Times top brass suspected that Duranty was writing Stalinist propaganda, but did nothing. In her exposé “Stalin’s Apologist: Walter Duranty, the New York Times’s man in Moscow,” S.J. Taylor makes it clear that Carr Van Anda, the managing editor, Frederick T. Birchall, an assistant managing editor, and Edwin L. James, the later managing editor, were troubled with Duranty’s Moscow reporting but did nothing about it. Birchall recommended that Duranty be replaced but, says Taylor, “the recommendation fell by the wayside.”
(...)