Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Venturer

But let’s put women into combat. That will reduce it. /s


8 posted on 05/08/2013 9:37:46 AM PDT by Richard from IL
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]


To: Richard from IL

It’s a funny thing that we can train women to go into combat, but they cannot protect themselves from Sexual advances.

If they cannot fight their way out from under a rapist how can they face a combatant with a bayonet, or any fighting that has to be done hand to hand?

Women in Combat is a baaaaad idea. What fool ever thought of that. I know it was women, and they never thought about facing someone with a bayonet, they were looking for a way to advance their promotional prospects.

Women do not belong working with men in Combat or in the various jobs of the military. When you put men and women in close contact sooner or later somebody is going to want to have sex. I know they are trying to stop that by loading up with queers, but that isn’t going to work either. Sooner or later some queer is going to get his ass kicked trying to butt hole bandit a straight marine.


26 posted on 05/08/2013 10:16:20 AM PDT by Venturer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]

To: Richard from IL
yep. Women (and others) who, apparently, are unable to protect themselves from sexual assault, are going to defend our country from the cream of the Chinese (or whoever) infantry.

Wonder how much Grandpa's army of 1942 worried about sexual assault in the ranks?

29 posted on 05/08/2013 10:42:56 AM PDT by wbill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson