Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: 9YearLurker

I see your point. You can’t have mixed singles as it were. Not for the couples sake but for the sake of the single folks.

But homes seem to be expressing an “ick” factor that would have us lableled as bigoted and prejudiced against the disabled. Not to mention paternalistic: she doesn’t know how to consent to sex? Really? You[they] know that how?

Perhaps a “new paradigm” can be created. They love creating paradigms all the time.


28 posted on 05/08/2013 6:28:53 AM PDT by Adder (No, Mr. Franklin, we could NOT keep it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]


To: Adder

I don’t work with disabled women, but I can imagine having the lack of an ability to consent being a real issue.

It’s okay with me if women-only homes for the disabled choose to stay that way. (Even though already I’m sure they’d be obligated to take in those who ‘identify as’ women, but are men.)


32 posted on 05/08/2013 7:21:05 AM PDT by 9YearLurker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson