Search twitter etc & see Democrats saying we GOP voters should have rejected him based on our Conservative standards etc. Well, how he will vote is all that I cared about.
Enjoy it when he’s the deciding vote for gun control and gay marriage, and when he gets arrested exposing himself to nuns.
That’s the way I look at it. He screwed up but its in the past and now its time to look to the future.
That's the trap. The Dems can torpedo any Rep candidate by just finding something that will upset those who demand saints for candidates. As long as he votes conservative on the important votes, I don't care what he does on his own time.
“Search twitter etc & see Democrats saying we GOP voters should have rejected him based on our Conservative standards etc. Well, how he will vote is all that I cared about.”
OK, then what does that say about liberal democrat standards? Do they realize they are admitting that they are perfectly comfortable with scumbags?
As awful as many Republicans are (and there are many), I still maintain the worst Republican is better than the best Democrat.
Right, like we should take standards advice from Dims. Rich.
>Search twitter etc & see Democrats saying we GOP voters should have rejected him based on our Conservative standards etc. Well, how he will vote is all that I cared about.<
Speaking of searching Twitter:
Nice voting SC, you dodged a bullet.
I wish Democrats would hold their politicians to the same standards that they hold Republican politicians.
If he is a consistently conservative vote - then as Lincoln said of Grant “I cannot spare this man, he fights.”
In that vein - when Lincoln was told that Grant was a drunk he said “Find out what he drinks and send a case of it to my other Generals”; so if Sanford is a consistent conservative vote - “Find me more Argentinian women and send a truckload of them to my other Congressmen.”
;)
Right, that's exactly what we said about Bill Clinton or Anthony Weiner.