Clift refused to answer Buchanan's question. Typical of a lib.
Pat is being too nice. It will destroy the economy of the USA.
This also results in a far different Mexico ~ and I don’t think Mexican society is resilient enough to survive it. They’ll be reduced to penury far nastier than anything they’ve known when slick Yankee traders come in and take all their stuff.
The unforseen problem is: If we feel responsible for taking care of people fleeing another countries corruption, poor living conditions and standards, than how long will it be until we feel it’s our responsibility in taking care of the other countries corruption, poor living conditions and standards?
Mexico has good security on their southern border.
20 million. And then their relatives, it will be over 40 million before we know it.
Response: Pat is a little late as there has been no Sourthern border for years. Besides a border is irrelevant as no one will do a D*mn thing about the army invading our country. Americans are too sick physically, psychologically and spiritually(I don't mean the Old Time Religion.).
However we resolve the residency status of people who are presently here illegally, it MUST NOT lead to them being able to vote. PERIOD.
Nah a border won’t be needed as Mexico and Canada will become new states. Like a Kansas-Nebraska deal.
Pat Buchanan has been vilified by conservatives in the past, but his positions (other than on Israel) seem to be in the process of being vindicated.