> Last week, the Democratic Party insisted, In order for one to accept the claim that President Obamas birth certificate is a forgery [and that he is ineligible], one has to buy into a conspiracy theory so vast and byzantine that it sincerely taxes the imagination of reasonable minds.
Conspiracy is only when it isn’t true. It’s been proven. It doesn’t take much to tax Dem’s minds does it? And reasonable? At what time have the Dems been reasonable the last 5 years?
If it had been proven then Obama would be gone and we wouldn't be having these discussions.
Vast may be the wrong word, but the conspiracy would have to include a number of Hawaiian officials.
byzantine
That may also be the wrong word, but the Akaka fellow who signed and sealed the responses to the two secretaries of state (Arizona and Kansas IIRC) would have to carefully parse words to carefully hide one of two things: an embarassing or potentially disqualifying item on an original ceritificate on file in Hawaii or a modern forgery of an original certificate that was then placed in the file. The former seems a lot more likely from all of the evidence, not just the reproductions of the cert.