Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 05/03/2013 8:29:36 PM PDT by EternalVigilance
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: EternalVigilance

Good. Bad. Indifferent.

What?


2 posted on 05/03/2013 8:30:51 PM PDT by eddie willers
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: EternalVigilance

Running for president?


4 posted on 05/03/2013 8:36:01 PM PDT by Linda Frances (Woe to those who call evil good and good evil, who put darkness for light and light for darkness)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: EternalVigilance

Darn. He’s a great Congressman. Hope he’s planning to at least stay in Congress.


8 posted on 05/03/2013 8:38:50 PM PDT by Jane Long (While Marxists continue the fundamental transformation of the USA, progressive RINOs stay silent.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: EternalVigilance

Dagnabit! He’d have made a GREAT senator!!


15 posted on 05/03/2013 9:33:36 PM PDT by HeartlandOfAmerica (Get in touch with your galtitude!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: EternalVigilance

He must have gotten a call from Karl Rove.


16 posted on 05/03/2013 9:47:33 PM PDT by bigbob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: EternalVigilance

unfortunately, it sounds like a win for Rove and his “conservative victory project”. I’m sure they did a lot behind the scenes. Hope we don’t end up seeing more establishment guys in 2014 in prepartion for Jeb in 2016.


17 posted on 05/03/2013 9:48:43 PM PDT by jeltz25
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: EternalVigilance

This is probably fine... The Senate almost invariably turns erstwhile Conservatives into liberal pod people. Since they don’t have to run until every six years, they tend to get fat and more susceptible to corruption than those on a shorter leash (those that have to run every two years). I hope Ted Cruz proves to be an exception, but he will certainly have to withstand a bunch of crap from the Media and pod people Republicans (e.g., McCain, Lindsey, etc).


19 posted on 05/03/2013 10:11:03 PM PDT by El Cid (Believe on the Lord Jesus Christ, and thou shalt be saved, and thy house...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: EternalVigilance

None of the names mentioned are remotely conservative. Everyone of these 2nd tier candidates would vote for:

Increasing the debt.
Continued taxpayer funded abortion.
Amnesty.
Gun regulations.
Keeping the Federal Reserve.
International Treaties greater than the Constitution.
Wars without end.
Ad nausium, etc, etc.

King would have been the most conservative choice. Now, Bruce Braley who is more liberal than Pelosi or Reid will win.

And we will have an ugly bitter and divisive primary to waste money on while building up campaigns that will fracture a generation with their infighting.

Oh, and we will not carry the 1st or 2nd districts either.

That is what this announcement really means.


28 posted on 05/04/2013 1:17:21 AM PDT by Waywardson (I did not vote for that pro-abortionist candidate!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: fieldmarshaldj; yongin; Perdogg; AuH2ORepublican; BillyBoy; randita; DIRTYSECRET; Jane Long

King, who surprised me by and in his own words embarrassed himself for taking so long to decide, has bowed out and is staying in House.

Frankly I thought he’d have trouble in the general election.

But we now lack any candidate that I know of. Several people bowed out, deferring to King. I hope some reconsider.


29 posted on 05/04/2013 10:35:45 PM PDT by Impy (All in favor of Harry Reid meeting Mr. Mayhem?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson