Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: SeminoleCounty

First of all, I don’t know whether Marx was a free trader or not. It doesn’t matter, since it was hardly a main tenet of his and since even a stopped clock is right twice a day. Maybe this was one of those times.

Marx was not in favor of any economic liberty, and the free trade position is the liberty position. That’s why Reagan looked to Friedman, NOT BUCHANAN, on issues of economics. And if you need to be shown that liberty works, then you are on the wrong damned side of the leger. The only economies that have ever worked in world history are the freer economies, all things considered. Liberty works, and if you doubt it, begone to HuffPo and DU.


59 posted on 05/03/2013 3:38:21 PM PDT by C. Edmund Wright (Tokyo Rove is more than a name, it's a GREAT WEBSITE)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies ]


To: C. Edmund Wright

Karl Marx stated that he was in favor of “free trade” because it would lead to a revolution of the proletariat vs. the bourgeois. And protectionists who quote him, agree with him.


72 posted on 05/03/2013 6:09:43 PM PDT by 1rudeboy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies ]

To: C. Edmund Wright

Leading to a very humorous paradox: people who agree with Marx calling you a Marxist.


73 posted on 05/03/2013 6:13:11 PM PDT by 1rudeboy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies ]

To: C. Edmund Wright
I see you are still attacking those who disagree.

At least this time you are defending Friedman.

74 posted on 05/03/2013 6:15:42 PM PDT by quimby
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson