Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: topher
One thing that could be done would be to use something like the A-10 Warthog as Fighters to accompany the tanker until it gains enough altitude.

A manpad may or may not be able to do much damage to an A-10. I believe A-10's have been known to loose an engine and still fly. Plus the fact that the cockpit is kind of armored like an army tank.

But KC-10 tanker, loaded with fuel, is a different story.

Providing escort, in this part of the world, might not be a bad idea.

It is unfortunate that the KC-46 is not available today but in the future.

Maybe the air force should have put more of a priority on their beans and bullets (tankers) than their fancy weapons (F-22, F-35 programs).

57 posted on 05/03/2013 8:43:31 AM PDT by topher (Traditional values -- especially family values -- which have been proven over time.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies ]


To: topher

My son is a KC-135 pilot who has deployed twice now. He lost a pilot friend this past week in Afghanistan.


63 posted on 05/03/2013 9:43:44 AM PDT by uscga77
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies ]

To: topher

>>>One thing that could be done would be to use something like the A-10 Warthog as Fighters to accompany the tanker until it gains enough altitude.

A manpad may or may not be able to do much damage to an A-10. I believe A-10’s have been known to loose an engine and still fly. Plus the fact that the cockpit is kind of armored like an army tank.<<<

Idea is not new for this part of the world. In 1980s Soviets used helicopter gunships to shield troop transports from heat-seeking missiles over Kabul airport and Bagram airbase.


64 posted on 05/03/2013 9:52:00 AM PDT by cunning_fish
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson