Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 05/02/2013 8:27:11 PM PDT by KentuckyTim
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: KentuckyTim

first amendment but not for anyone who opposes the faker in the blight house...


3 posted on 05/02/2013 8:31:13 PM PDT by cherry
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: KentuckyTim

Non-sexual nudity?

Moosechelle? Pelosi? Barney Fwank? Helen Thomas?

Help me out here people!


4 posted on 05/02/2013 8:31:25 PM PDT by null and void ("Och, aye 'twas a huge beastie the shape of a haggis but the size o' the football pitch at Dunkeld!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: KentuckyTim

The Communist Takeover Of
America - 45 Declared Goals

#24. Eliminate all laws governing obscenity by calling them “censorship” and a violation of free speech and free press.

http://rense.com/general32/americ.htm

(Hurry up, commies!)


5 posted on 05/02/2013 8:31:38 PM PDT by Mortrey (Impeach President Soros)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: KentuckyTim; All
To begin with, the Founding States made the first numbered clauses in the Constitution, evidently a good place to hide them from Obama, Sections 1-3 of Article I, to clarify that all federal legislative powers are vested in the elected members of Congress, not in unelected bureaucrats in constitutionally undefined federal agencies like the FCC. So no bureaucrat in so-called "independent federal regulatory agencies" like the FCC can regulate speech, even to declare that there are no regulations.

And speaking of regulating speech, Thomas Jefferson had noted that the Founding States had made the 10th Amendment to clarify that the states had reserved government power to regulate our constitutional rights, even those protected by the 1st Amendment, uniquely to the states, power now limited by the 14th Amendment, regardless that the Founding States had also made the 1st Amendment to clarify that such powers are prohibited to Congress entirely.

"3. Resolved that it is true as a general principle and is also expressly declared by one of the amendments to the constitution that ‘the powers not delegated to the US. by the constitution, nor prohibited by it to the states, are reserved to the states respectively or to the people’: and that no power over the freedom of religion, freedom of speech, or freedom of the press being delegated to the US. by the constitution, nor prohibited by it to the states, all lawful powers respecting the same did of right remain, & were reserved, to the states or the people: that thus was manifested their determination to retain to themselves the right of judging how far the licentiousness of speech and of the press may be abridged without lessening their useful freedom, and how far those abuses which cannot be separated from their use should be tolerated rather than the use be destroyed (emphasis added); …" --Thomas Jefferson, Kentucky Resolutions, 1798.

So as Jefferson indicated, it's basically up to the individual states, not Congress or any rogue agency of the corrupt federal government, to reasonably decide how far laws to limit speech can go.

11 posted on 05/02/2013 9:01:42 PM PDT by Amendment10
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: KentuckyTim

Because there’s not enough filth on TV.


12 posted on 05/02/2013 9:01:42 PM PDT by informavoracious (We're being "punished" with Stanley Ann's baby.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: KentuckyTim

HEY-HEY,
HO-HO,
Commie Obama
Has got to GO!

HEY-HEY,
HO-HO,
Commie Obama
Has got to GO!

HEY-HEY,
HO-HO,
Commie Obama
Has got to GO!


13 posted on 05/02/2013 9:08:15 PM PDT by Graewoulf (Traitor John Roberts' Commune-Style Obama'care' violates U.S. Constitution AND Anti-Trust Law.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: KentuckyTim

on the road to perdition


14 posted on 05/02/2013 9:09:15 PM PDT by yldstrk (My heroes have always been cowboys)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: KentuckyTim

my sister worked for a “first amendment lawyer”and when I asked what that was she said he mostly defended porn stores.


15 posted on 05/02/2013 9:14:59 PM PDT by yldstrk (My heroes have always been cowboys)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: KentuckyTim

16 posted on 05/02/2013 9:21:19 PM PDT by SandRat (Duty - Honor - Country! What else needs said?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: KentuckyTim

Corruption, perversion, Obama, ‘Rats, the future.


17 posted on 05/02/2013 9:25:49 PM PDT by BenLurkin (This is not a statement of fact. It is either opinion or satire; or both)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: KentuckyTim

Wait a sec, I thought that little freak was no longer in that position.

IF this is accurate, it doesn’t even make me blink -
the faster the wheels fall off this whole mess, the more
time to do the real work of cleaning out the filth.


19 posted on 05/02/2013 9:40:46 PM PDT by AllAmericanGirl44
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: KentuckyTim

To save your family, kids, marriage, ethics & religion, you have to live way out on a farm, grow your food, homeschool your kids, throw away TV, radio and video games, live off the grid & out of the big eye of government and only contact others you know are like minded good people via dead letter drops. Anything less and our corrupt society will turn your brain to mush and make you into a slave to the Devil. Am I overstating the crisis?


24 posted on 05/02/2013 10:26:57 PM PDT by RicocheT (Eat the rich only if you're certain it's your last meal)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: KentuckyTim

They are already easing the foul language on tv. I was watching Dallas last week and they said the s*** word not once but 2 times I remember telling my husband I was shocked. I watched the original Dallas back in the day and they never had bad words. Obama and his ilk are bad for America


25 posted on 05/02/2013 11:41:11 PM PDT by funfan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Team Caligula.


26 posted on 05/02/2013 11:44:52 PM PDT by Gene Eric (The Palin Doctrine.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: KentuckyTim

HMMMM... Was “non-sexual” nudity ever banned by the FCC? Just wondering when or if? For those old enough to remember, several times, PBS broadcasted a movie over the FCC airways in the 1980’s which contained several instances of full frontal nudity. The name of the movie escapes me now but IIRC it was considered a “classic” portrayal of “heaven” or some such trash.


27 posted on 05/03/2013 1:29:03 AM PDT by TexasRedeye (Eschew Obfuscation)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: KentuckyTim

I think they should allow non-sexual sex, as well, especially for kids programs.

I am all for nude reporters at obama press conferences. Oh, that’s right. He doesn’t do those.

If they ever open up the White House tours, can I go naked?


29 posted on 05/03/2013 2:09:54 AM PDT by Right Wing Assault (Dick Obama is more inexperienced now than he was before he was elected.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: KentuckyTim

All of which the purpose is for the people to get behind an attack on placing restrictions on said first amendment, with the ultimate goal being a Constitutional Convention to turn the U.S Constitution on its ass. Just whittling away on one root at a time.


30 posted on 05/03/2013 2:25:26 AM PDT by Real Cynic No More
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: KentuckyTim

What will constitute non-sexual, remember Clinton said the Lewinsky is not sex.


31 posted on 05/03/2013 3:10:12 AM PDT by PoloSec ( Believe the Gospel: how that Christ died for our sins, was buried and rose again)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson