So once again the Cornh***er noob is here to tell us about Kansas and States rights. The Constitution and the interpretation thereof is finally in the hands of the people. You may choose to disagree but that's how it was established and that is how it will be preserved.
Because after all nullification has had such a successful track record in our nation's history. </sarcasm>
Want to read the Constitution? Then try reading it. I realize that it's probably a lot longer document than Jayhawkers usually tackle, but try to get down to Article IV where it says, "This Constitution, and the Laws of the United States which shall be made in Pursuance thereof; and all Treaties made, or which shall be made, under the Authority of the United States, shall be the supreme Law of the Land; and the Judges in every State shall be bound thereby, any Thing in the Constitution or Laws of any State to the Contrary notwithstanding." That means Holder's right when he says federal laws trump state laws. But that assumes the federal law is Constitutional and Holder is not the person to be deciding that. So what you clods need to do is actually arrest a federal officer trying to uphold federal law, take the matter through the courts, and prove your side is right. Can you all handle that or do we need to count on some other state that's passed similar a similar law?