Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: SeekAndFind

This is directly from Saul Alinsky’s playbook.

Think of the word Obama used to get gay marriage accepted — “EVOLUTION”.

During the 2008 campaign, he said he was against gay marriage... now, he “evolved” and accepts it.

Same thing happened to abortion. First, it was limited to the early trimesters, now, even full term babies are being aborted ...

Things don’t change with a big bang, Freedom isn’t taken away immediately, the right to own firearms is not taken away at once... the changes creep in slowly, make people docile so that they can “get use to it”... until suddenly... it is too late.

Same thing will happen to your IRAs and 401K. They will attack the “very rich” first ( e.g. you can’t save more than $3 Million dollars in your IRA ). Then slowly but surely, the term “rich” evolves until YOU are the rich who gets targeted.

That has ALWAYS been the Saul Alinsky strategy.


2 posted on 05/01/2013 10:41:40 AM PDT by SeekAndFind
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: SeekAndFind

The next step is to mandate a small percentage to be invested in “safe” government securities to protect against a potential market collapse. Then they will up the percentage until most private retirement funds are heavy into government debt. The FED can’t finance $85 billion a month forever.


26 posted on 05/01/2013 10:59:07 AM PDT by Sgt_Schultze (A half-truth is a complete lie)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: SeekAndFind
I'm usually the last person to defend Obama on anything, but the proposals here are hardly outrageous. Consider this:

1. The Federal tax code already caps IRAs and 401(k) accounts. What it doesn't do right now is cap the total value of a tax-deferred account, but it does limit the tax deductibility of contributions up front.

2. The $205,000 annual limit is based on Section 415(b)(1)(A) of the Internal Revenue Code, which limits the amount of money that can be paid out to a pensioner under a defined-benefit plan.

I don't think these changes will see the light of day, but it's hard to complain about changes in the tax code as they relate to a retirement system that is already heavily regulated and has enormous incentives under the tax code as it currently stands.

60 posted on 05/01/2013 5:20:27 PM PDT by Alberta's Child ("I am the master of my fate ... I am the captain of my soul.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson