Posted on 04/30/2013 5:33:37 PM PDT by markomalley
“I’m not convinced..... but then again I don’t subscribe to the fact that all homos are raging perverts.”
Did the previous post clear it up ?
Red herring much?
You are killing me here!! LMAO
You mean my renter? You, sir, are an ass.
Obviously John O doesn’t mean an orphanage with sex perverts running on it.
ANY OPTION (leaving aside murderers, tortures and the like) is better than involving mentally ill sex perverts in anything to do with children who have no blood relatives to live with.
There have always been, are now, and will always be other options for such children than to give them to mentally ill sex perverts who have a traditional and historical attraction to children.
Homosexuals should never, ever be allowed around children - as so-called parents, teachers, advisors, counselors, pastors, priests, BIg Brothers/Sisters, nothing - nada - ever! And any parents who have a homosexual relative should keep their children away from him/her too.
When I was a foster parent my wife and I were in a required parenting class. Two Butches in the class together were bragging how they had their foster kids doing all the work for them. Just what a traumatized child needs is two screwed up in their brains adults playing house.
Why the he!! is this homo promoter not zotted??
Any pesron who thinks a child is safe with a homosexual is not a right minded person.
Admin - this person is shoving the virtue of homosexual adoption on this thread, non-stop.
Dunno. Might as well ask though...
Anyone on Modland see this thread and the promotion of gay adoption as a good thing?
“Do you feel homosexuals should be given preference to adopt over hetro people into BDSM? Or foot fetishists? Or people into watersports?
If not, why?”
Whew Norm, what do you think, where would you draw the line?
People into Watersports are a bit iffy.
“Obviously John O doesn’t mean an orphanage with sex perverts running on it.”
Why not - he assumes that folks he call homos are perverts, when he doesn’t even know if they are engaging in sex
This homo promoter is making it his second job practically, maybe from work if he has a job.
I think you need to explain why adoption based on sex practice is OK for homosexuals but not corprophagists.
“Red herring much?”
got ya - huh
lol
Homosexual means those who engage is same sex acts.
Simple.
“You mean my renter? You, sir, are an ass”
??
Isn’t that a continuum? Do you mean crap eaters?
Eaters, players, anything you can do with a pile of it for ‘sex’ purposes...and Eating in there by definition
That’s what I thought. Supposedly Hitler was one.
“Any pesron who thinks a child is safe with a homosexual is not a right minded person.
Admin - this person is shoving the virtue of homosexual adoption on this thread, non-stop.”
What are talking about???? Ryan’s wasn’t arguing the virtue of homosexual adoption he was arguing it as an alternative if none other existed.
Any person who thinks heterosexual perversion is more virtuous than homosexual perversion for adopting a child is sick, when in fact both forms of sex are perverted, and neither suitable for adopting a child.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.