Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Wordkraft

Sexual Orientation is not (currently) a protected class under EEOC guidelines.


11 posted on 04/29/2013 11:30:31 AM PDT by cincinnati65
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]


To: cincinnati65

“Sexual Orientation is not (currently) a protected class under EEOC guidelines.”

But de facto it is and any halfway adequate lawyer could get a huge jury reward.


29 posted on 04/29/2013 11:38:58 AM PDT by Wordkraft (Remember who the Collaborators are.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies ]

To: cincinnati65

True...but there are local laws.

Where I live (Topeka, KS), a law was passed which prevents an employer from firing an employee because he/she is gay.

So if you’ve got a waiter talking in a deliberate lisp, giggling, etc...you take a huge risk firing him/her.

Looked at another way, every time you hire somebody, you are possibly hiring somebody into a ‘sting’ operation, in which they try to be as over the top gay as possible, just to temp you to fire them....so they can sue you.

I think our law also has a thought police provision, where you get sued if you fail to hire a gay person.


37 posted on 04/29/2013 11:41:57 AM PDT by lacrew (Mr. Soetoro, we regret to inform you that your race card is over the credit limit.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies ]

To: cincinnati65

It will be soon enough. Churches inevitably will be threatened.


128 posted on 04/29/2013 4:33:48 PM PDT by heye2monn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson