Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Joe Manchin is not done with gun control. Does it matter?
The Washington Post ^ | April 29, 2013 | Sean Sullivan

Posted on 04/29/2013 10:08:29 AM PDT by 2ndDivisionVet

Eleven days after the amendment he co-authored to expand background checks for gun purchases was rejected by his Senate colleagues, Sen. Joe Manchin (D-W.Va.) sounded optimistic Sunday about a second try.

“I’m willing to go anywhere in this country, I’m going to debate anybody on this issue, read the bill and you tell me what you don’t like,” Manchin said on “Fox News Sunday,” reiterating his intention to bring his measure back to the Senate floor.

Mission impossible? No. But the rebooted fight Manchin is promising will face long odds during the next 18 months for a simple reason: High-profile political battles like the one over guns don’t happen in a vacuum.

Even after intense lobbying by President Obama, winning bipartisan support, and polling that showed 90 percent of Americans supported the idea, the push to expand background checks failed. After the vote, an angry Obama vowed the fight was not over and Manchin and other advocates have suggested losing the round doesn’t amount to losing the bout....

(Excerpt) Read more at washingtonpost.com ...


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Crime/Corruption; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: banglist; democrats; guncontrol; manchin; obama; secondamendment
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-25 next last
There's that 90% lie again.
1 posted on 04/29/2013 10:08:29 AM PDT by 2ndDivisionVet
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

He’s just trying to make points with Obama and the Progressives. he will go no place—he will be tarnished by it. He’s hoping the voters will have a short memory—I think he’s betting on the wrong horse this time.


2 posted on 04/29/2013 10:10:55 AM PDT by Forward the Light Brigade (Into the Jaws of H*ll)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet
The senate has moved on to the immigration bill, I don't see them moving the debate back on to gun control, and end up risking both amnesty and gun control in the process. The only way I see that happening is if there is another Newtown like attack, which sadly enough many of the ghouls are probably hoping for...
3 posted on 04/29/2013 10:13:06 AM PDT by apillar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

I care! Manchin is a gun grabbing idiot!!

4 posted on 04/29/2013 10:14:09 AM PDT by Perseverando (The truth is hate to those who hate the truth.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

Yes. Because it shoes Libs never ever stop trying to deny your rights and that many of the GOP are willing to help them continue to do just that.


5 posted on 04/29/2013 10:16:05 AM PDT by Norm Lenhart
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet
Note how entirely partisan the Post is in this article, which is supposed to be about politics, not opinion. Not one word on the questionable constitutionality of the bill. Not one word on the costs. Not one word about the bill being “controversial.

Everything in the Article implies that this bill was entirely desirable and workable.

Then again, this is exactly what we expect from the Obama Administration Post.

6 posted on 04/29/2013 10:16:58 AM PDT by marktwain (The MSM must die for the Republic to live. Long live the new media!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet
He sounds a little bit desperate. And pathetic.

And by the way, thanks a lot, WV.

7 posted on 04/29/2013 10:17:24 AM PDT by clintonh8r ("Europe was created by history. America was created by a philosophy." Baroness Thatcher)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Forward the Light Brigade
He’s just trying to make points with Obama and the Progressives. he will go no place—he will be tarnished by it. He’s hoping the voters will have a short memory—I think he’s betting on the wrong horse this time.

Good ol' Joe has delusions of grandeur since he made it to Washington. Word in the West Virginia press is that he sees himself as the next Bill Clinton, a "moderate" folksy former Governor from a rural state, and is trying to position himself for the VP spot or perhaps even a presidential run in 2016. Unfortunately, (for Joe) he needs to move left to have any chance nationally as a Democrat, he has way to much conservative baggage right now, an A rating from the NRA (or at least he did), pro-life and anti-gay marriage. (expect a lot of "evolving" on those issues in the near future.)

8 posted on 04/29/2013 10:19:25 AM PDT by apillar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

I really don’t think the problem is with the bill itself. I don’t support extra background checks ... but I think most people probably would.

The real problem is — nobody trusts the President or his lackies. When they say “its just about background checks at gun shows” nobody believes it. Nobody trusts that the Senate has even read the bill. Nobody trusts that Democrats wouldn’t shove some stupid incomprehensible footnote into a supposed ‘background check’ bill that chipped away at something other than background checks.

Manchin’s problem isn’t the bill. Manchin’s problem is the bill’s supporters.

SnakeDoc


9 posted on 04/29/2013 10:23:42 AM PDT by SnakeDoctor ("I've shot people I like more for less." -- Raylan Givens)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

show me how his bill stops another newtown. it won’t.

show me how this ill isn’t infringement disguised as “regulation”. regulation in the 2nd amendmnpent is a specific term meant to be applied to the practice and drilling of the militia, not restricting what arms a citizen could or couldn’t own,’nor had anything to do with background checks or waiting periods, or how you could sell your own firearm to someone else.


10 posted on 04/29/2013 10:24:15 AM PDT by Secret Agent Man (I can neither confirm or deny that; even if I could, I couldn't - it's classified.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

The late British gun writer, Geoffrey Boothroyd, was fond of saying the only natural enemies of guns are rust and politicians. It’s now obvious that politicians have proved far more dangerous.


11 posted on 04/29/2013 10:25:01 AM PDT by Stevenc131
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

Yes, that 90% lie gives them the *authority* to abolish the 2nd Amendment by default.

They will never stop. Even AFTER they pass some full disarmament legislation - it will not be enough.

Ruling Class Oligarchs and Leftists always end up going all the way - to genocide as the final solution - to all the problems they demand get solved.


12 posted on 04/29/2013 10:28:59 AM PDT by INVAR ("Fart for liberty, fart for freedom and fart proudly!" - Benjamin Franklin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet
If they honestly intended to strengthen the 'National Instant Check System' (NICS) at the retail point of sale at the gun store, I'm won't quarrel with them and neither would most NRA members and non-affiliated shooters and gun owners. I'm just surprised that most people in America think it actually does something useful. Unfortunately, very few people know what the NICS check does.

NICS doesn't check a firearm's serial number, nor is it required to check a Social Security Number of an applicant, or establish residency, or anything else. It's just a yellow sheet from the ATF that says "If you lie on this form, you are in big trouble mister" and then does pretty much nothing else. The ATF very rarely prosecutes criminals for illegally attempting to purchase a firearm from legal means even if they perjure themselves on the ATF Form 4474 used in the NICS check. I think I read that that there were 80 convictions last year out of tens of thousands of denials, many of which were invalid denials because of shoddy government records-keeping. All NICS does is check an FBI database of known felons assembled from data provided to the FBI by the separate states, if they ever got around to it or are the least bit accurate. No state Dept of Justice will testify their records are accurate or up to date.

I'm fairly certain that if I had the go-ahead from some Congressional committee and immunity from prosecution by the DOJ, I could easily go around illegally purchasing firearms after submitting to a full NICS check using legitimate state-issued identification under fraudulent names. In fact, I bet I could acquire a legitimate state-issued driver's license under the name 'Dzhokar Tsarnaev' and turn right around and pass a Federal NICS check.

It also amazes me that teachers all over America rejected the notion that they're law enforcement officers in determining which of the students in their classes are illegal aliens when that was a hot issue, yet we demand that some fellow running a legitimate gun shop be a cop who who is an illegal alien and who's not --- never mind that several states give driver's licenses and state ID to illegal aliens.

Don't even get me started on how the Virginia Tech shooter and other recent spree-killers wouldn't have shown up on the NICS check even though they'd been institutionalized, even the loony that plugged Gabby Giffords. The mental health advocates are very much against adding wackos to the NICS check, and those incidents are the ones which prompted this whole 'Background Check' debate.

America needs to understand what the NICS background check actually consists of, not merely that "We oughtta have more background checks!"; our background checks we have no amount to basically jack and squat.

13 posted on 04/29/2013 10:37:10 AM PDT by The KG9 Kid (Demand Common Sense Nut Control.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

I heard some say that this will become “Obama’s Stalingrad,” that is a battle that he can neither win nor retreat from, and it will suck all the energy out of his secod term. One can only hope.


14 posted on 04/29/2013 10:43:55 AM PDT by atomic_dog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

Manchin is the one who’s done.


15 posted on 04/29/2013 10:44:48 AM PDT by ozzymandus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet
There's that 90% lie again

It is frigthening how in lock-step the government and media are at this point.

16 posted on 04/29/2013 10:49:24 AM PDT by Sicon ("All animals are equal, but some animals are more equal than others." - G. Orwell)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: marktwain

“Not one word on the questionable constitutionality of the bill. Not one word on the costs. Not one word about the bill being “controversial.”

And not one word about the relevance of background checks to the actions of the Newtown shooter, or, for that matter, the Colorado theater shooter.
Which category of legal gun purchases presently is not subject to background checks?


17 posted on 04/29/2013 11:00:05 AM PDT by Elsiejay
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet
Even after intense lobbying by President Obama, winning bipartisan support, and polling that showed 90 percent of Americans supported the idea...

They're still pushing that chestnut?

18 posted on 04/29/2013 11:01:11 AM PDT by Rummyfan (Iraq: it's not about Iraq He could sure play that axe. RIP anymore, it's about the USA!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet
Someone should shove a sex toy into Sen. Joe Manchin's mouth and through his spinal cord.
The only way to stop these stinkin' liberals is to bury them.
19 posted on 04/29/2013 11:04:07 AM PDT by Yosemitest (It's Simple ! Fight, ... or Die !)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet
"...after ... polling that showed 90 percent of Americans supported the idea, the push to expand background checks failed."

The MSM is so far gone, that they honestly believe they can continue to sell this swill in the face of simple logic and reasoning.

Any bill that has that level of strong support among the American people, will sail through Congress without a hitch. If a bill that is being pushed with all the force the White House can muster fails to pass, it's a clear sign that most Senators know which way the winds of public opinion are blowing on it.

So does the lying MSM.

20 posted on 04/29/2013 11:22:42 AM PDT by Windflier (To anger a conservative, tell him a lie. To anger a liberal, tell him the truth.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-25 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson