Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: kimtom

I believe evolution thru natural selection is fact and changes species over time. But these species evolve as a subset of that original species. I see no evidence where one species begets another different. There are no crossover croca-horse fossils.


9 posted on 04/29/2013 8:44:49 AM PDT by central_va (I won't be reconstructed and I do not give a damn.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: central_va

“..evolve as a subset of that original species...”

I would agree changes within species, but not change into another....i.e. frog, to horse.
(requires adding information to complexity)


62 posted on 04/29/2013 11:05:14 AM PDT by kimtom (USA ; Freedom is not Free)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]

To: central_va
central_va: "I see no evidence where one species begets another different.
There are no crossover croca-horse fossils."

Of course not, and nobody ever said there is.
But we are dealing here with a precise scientific definition of the word "species" -- what is it?

For example, Polar Bears and Brown Bears were classified scientifically as separate "genera" but recently got changed to just different "species" of the same genus.
One reason: they do occasionally mate and produce viable hybrid offspring, sometimes called a "groler-bear".

Point is: most of these changes take place over long periods of time, generation by generation, and so it is not possible to pinpoint precisely when one sub-species has changed just enough to be considered a new species, or one species changed just enough to be called a new genus, etc.

Groler-bear:

118 posted on 04/30/2013 2:22:59 AM PDT by BroJoeK (a little historical perspective....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson